<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Dispute Resolution</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/dispute-resolution.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:32:33Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/dispute-resolution.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/dispute-resolution.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the U.S. Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants&apos; privacy. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief provides an overview of a collection of essays, a collaborative project by the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy, examining the trade-offs between transparency and confidentiality in the civil justice system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New Book Explores Transparency in the American Civil Justice System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The quest for greater transparency in the American civil justice system is the topic of a new book of essays illustrating how a balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the civil justice system, raise public confidence and protect litigants&apos; privacy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Analysis of Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections over the Past Two Decades</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR883.html</id>
   <published>Feb 22, 2012</published>
   <updated>Feb 22, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">To summarize trends and identify factors contributing to bid protest activity and outcomes in Air Force procurements, the authors assembled data from Air Force administrative databases on procurement activity and protests and developed statistical models to analyze bid protests.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR883.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections: Evidence and Options &amp;mdash; Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1077.html</id>
   <published>Feb 22, 2012</published>
   <updated>Feb 22, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Recent bid protests have caused large disruptions in resource and operational planning in the Air Force, even leading to the cancellation of the Combat Search and Rescue helicopter program. Some tactics that the Air Force could use to counter such protests in the future include simplifying and clarifying selection criteria and priorities, explaining how its cost estimates are developed, and involving attorneys in external review of bids.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1077.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections: Evidence and Options</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB603.html</id>
   <published>Feb 22, 2012</published>
   <updated>Feb 22, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Recent bid protests have caused large disruptions in resource and operational planning in the Air Force, even leading to the cancellation of the Combat Search and Rescue helicopter program. Some tactics that the Air Force could use to counter such protests in the future include simplifying and clarifying selection criteria and priorities, explaining how its cost estimates are developed, and involving attorneys in external review of bids.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB603.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Making the Civil Justice System More Efficient and Equitable</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html</id>
   <published>Oct 3, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 3, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) conducts research on all aspects of civil justice, from trends in litigation and jury verdicts to punitive damages, compensation systems, and alternative dispute resolution. Directly or indirectly, civil justice issues have an impact on us all. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Business-to-Business Arbitration in the United States: Perceptions of Corporate Counsel</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR781.html</id>
   <published>Jan 18, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 18, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Evidence suggests that arbitration clauses, though common in consumer contracts, are uncommon in commercial contracts, but research on why this may be so is scant. This report presents the findings of a survey and follow-up interviews of corporate counsel that sought to determine their thinking on domestic business-to-business arbitration and its use as an alternative to litigation.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR781.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Unintended Consequences of Court Arbitration: A Cautionary Tale from New Jersey</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP134.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Arbitration programs appear to meet a demand for fair, adjudicative third-party hearings, but in doing so, they don&apos;t always improve court efficiency.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP134.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trial and Appellate Courts</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP117.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This study reviews the available research on seven major court-administered alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures that appear to be particularly popular and representative of the broader range of alternatives.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP117.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Our Courts Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Reshaping Our Legal System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1090.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Federal courts are now required by law to offer some form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and many state courts require parties to attempt to resolve their cases through mediation before they can obtain a trial date. The author presents a personal critical perspective on the evolution of ADR in the legal world. She presents historical antecedents, discusses the &quot;community justice movement,&quot; the business community&apos;s joining of the ADR movement, and offers thoughts on the dispute resolution movement&apos;s contribution to changes in the view of the justice system.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1090.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing Claims Resolution Facilities: What We Need to Know</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP107.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article proposes an agenda for research on claims resolution facilities, the results of which could assist in improving the current set of facilities and fashioning better alternatives for the future.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP107.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Court-ordered Arbitration: An Alternative Overview</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP103.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article describes court-ordered arbitration and distinguishes it from other dispute resolution procedures.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP103.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Science in the Court:  Is There a Role for Alternative Dispute Resolution?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP109.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Science in the Court:  Is There a Role for Alternative Dispute Resolution?</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP109.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Improving Dispute Resolution for California&apos;s Injured Workers: Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1425z1.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2003</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;For more than two decades, the California workers&apos; compensation courts have been criticized for being slow, expensive, and procedurally inconsistent. In response to these concerns, the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers&apos; Compensation engaged the RAND Institute for Civil Justice to conduct a top-to-bottom review of the courts. The research team found that the courts&apos; problems stem largely from severe understaffing, the failure to upgrade their management information system, and a lack of clear guidance and coordination in the governing rules and procedures. (This document is an Executive  Summary of the full report on this study, Improving Dispute Resolution for  California&apos;s Injured Workers, MR-1425-ICJ, 2003. This Executive Summary  includes a CD that contains the text of the full report.)&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1425z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Improving Dispute Resolution for California&apos;s Injured Workers</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1425.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2002</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;For more than two decades, the California workers&apos; compensation courts have been criticized for being slow, expensive, and procedurally inconsistent. In response to these concerns, the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers&apos; Compensation engaged the RAND Institute for Civil Justice to conduct a top-to-bottom review of the courts. The research team found that the courts&apos; problems stem largely from severe understaffing, the failure to upgrade their management information system, and a lack of clear guidance and coordination in the governing rules and procedures.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1425.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Private Information, Self-Serving Biases, and Optimal Settlement Mechanisms: Theory and Evidence</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20030422.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2002</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The law and economics literature on suit and settlement has tended to focus on two alternative conceptual models.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20030422.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">ADR Research at the Crossroads</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP915.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article traces the development of empirical research on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and its impact on the legal system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP915.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Research Agenda: What We Need to Know About Court-Connected ADR</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP871.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1999</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Although practitioners of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have long emphasized the benefits of substituting problem-solving processes for adjudication, empirical studies indicate that ADR may not save litigation costs or time.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP871.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Binding Arbitration is Not Frequently Used to Resolve Health Care Disputes</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9030.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1998</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">Sought to provide evidence illuminating the questions of prevalence and factors leading to adoption in a study of practices in California.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9030.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

