<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Fighter Aircraft</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/fighter-aircraft.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:34Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/fighter-aircraft.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/fighter-aircraft.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Flawed Strategy, Not a &apos;Failure of Air Power,&apos; Led to Israel&apos;s Disappointing Performance in 2006 Lebanon War</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG835.html</id>
   <published>May 22, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 22, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Israel&apos;s disappointing performance in its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 did not reflect a &quot;failure of air power,&quot; but rather a failure of Israel&apos;s political and military leaders to properly assess the enemy, set achievable goals, apply an effective strategy and adequately manage public expectations.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG835.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Flawed Strategy, Not a &apos;Failure of Air Power,&apos; Led to Israel&apos;s Disappointing Performance in 2006 Lebanon War</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/05/23.html</id>
   <published>May 22, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 22, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Israel&apos;s disappointing performance in its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 did not reflect a &quot;failure of air power,&quot; but rather a failure of Israel&apos;s political and military leaders to properly assess the enemy, set achievable goals, apply an effective strategy and adequately manage public expectations.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/05/23.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The J-20 Episode and Civil-Military Relations in China</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT357.html</id>
   <published>Mar 10, 2011</published>
   <updated>Mar 10, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Written testimony submitted to the U.S. China Economic and Security Review Commission on March 10, 2011.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT357.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Retaining F-22A Tooling: Options and Costs</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR831.html</id>
   <published>Feb 21, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 21, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The last F-22A aircraft is scheduled for delivery in early 2012, so decisions must be made as to what tooling will be retained and what will be disposed of. The authors find that, for a modest, one-time additional cost of $17 million and a very small additional annual recurring cost, the Air Force can retain all F-22A unique government tools. They also find a difference of less than $1 billion between the costs of two different restart options.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR831.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Methodology for Comparing Costs and Benefits of Management Alternatives for F-22 Sustainment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR763.html</id>
   <published>Feb 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Air Force asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to perform a congressionally required assessment of contractor versus organic management of F-22 air vehicle and F119 engine sustainment to determine the most cost-effective approach. The methodology involved the development of notional government sustainment organizations and a consideration of a variety of factors relevant to such a decision, including the asserted benefits of each approach.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR763.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Investment Strategies for Improving Fifth-Generation Fighter Training</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR871.html</id>
   <published>Feb 10, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 10, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">To close existing training gaps for fifth-generation fighters, fully documented training requirements for realistic training scenarios are needed. In addition, resolution of technological uncertainties related to live, virtual, and constructive training capabilities could greatly improve training for fifth-generation fighters.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR871.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Evaluating the Desirability of Navy F/A-18E/F Service Life Extension Programs (SLEPs)</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR844.html</id>
   <published>Dec 14, 2010</published>
   <updated>Dec 14, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">As Navy aircraft age, leaders must decide whether to modify and upgrade the aging systems or replace them. Preliminary planning has begun as to the feasibility and desirability of a service life extension program (SLEP) on the F/A-18E/F versus buying replacement Joint Strike Fighters (JSFs). This report presents ranges of parameter values that favor versus oppose undertaking E/F SLEPs.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR844.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">MR612-2</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR612-2.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html"></summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR612-2.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">MR612-1</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR612-1.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html"></summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR612-1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Analysis of the Air Force Logistics Enterprise: Evaluation of Global Repair Network Options for Supporting the F-16 and KC-135</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG872.html</id>
   <published>Oct 30, 2009</published>
   <updated>Oct 30, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Analyses demonstrate how F-16 and KC-135 aircraft maintenance units can be reconfigured to support mission generation operations, with heavy maintenance such as aircraft phase inspections reassigned to a network of centralized repair facilities. This approach identifies options that either exceed current maintenance capabilities at current cost levels or meet required capability levels at reduced cost.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG872.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Netherlands F-16 Comparative Analysis: An Evaluation of the Process</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR656.html</id>
   <published>Dec 16, 2008</published>
   <updated>Dec 16, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In 2008, the Netherlands Ministry of Defence conducted a comparative analysis of potential candidates to replace its F-16 fighter aircraft. This report presents RAND Europe&apos;s evaluation of that analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR656.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Statement Regarding Media Coverage of F-35 Joint Strike Fighter</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/09/25.html</id>
   <published>Sep 25, 2008</published>
   <updated>Sep 25, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">Andrew Hoehn, Director of RAND Project Air Force, made a statement today regarding articles that have appeared in the Australian press with assertions regarding a war game in which analysts from RAND were involved.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/09/25.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Estimates Multiyear Purchase of F-22A Fighters Would Save Air Force Hundreds of Millions of Dollars</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/06/29.html</id>
   <published>Jun 29, 2007</published>
   <updated>Jun 29, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND Study Estimates Multiyear Purchase of F-22A Fighters Would Save Air Force Hundreds of Millions of Dollars, RAND Study Finds.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/06/29.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Multiyear Purchase of F-22A Fighters Would Save Hundreds of Millions of Dollars</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG664.html</id>
   <published>Jun 29, 2007</published>
   <updated>Jun 29, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Using a single three-year contract to buy 60 F-22A fighter jets along with engines and spare parts &amp;ndash; rather than using three separate annual contracts &amp;ndash; would save the U.S. Air Force hundreds of millions of dollars.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG664.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing the Impact of Future Operations on Trainer Aircraft Requirements</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG348.html</id>
   <published>Jun 29, 2005</published>
   <updated>Jun 29, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This monograph examines how the skills needed to perform future military missions might affect the capabilities required of new pilot training systems. In the next few years, the Air Force must decide to replace or extend the lives of two of its trainer aircraft. This monograph addresses which skills should be taught in undergraduate flying training, which are so different that they cannot be taught in current training aircraft, and what impact these issues have on decisions to replace or extend the lives of the aircraft.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG348.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Finds Competition And Innovation In Military Fixed-wing Aircraft Industry Threatened </title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2003/10/29.html</id>
   <published>Oct 28, 2003</published>
   <updated>Oct 28, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">There will be less competition and innovation in the U.S. military aircraft industry and some highly skilled specialists will leave the industry over the next 10 years unless the nation begins additional aircraft development programs, according to a RAND Corporation study released today.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2003/10/29.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Swarming -- The Next Face of Battle</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/09/29/AWST.html</id>
   <published>Sep 29, 2003</published>
   <updated>Sep 29, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Technological advances often give rise to new types of weapons, but the achievement of lasting breakthroughs in fighting power requires organizational and doctrinal innovation as we.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/09/29/AWST.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assembling and Supporting the Joint Strike Fighter in the UK: Issues and Costs</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1771.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2003</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This report contains an analysis conducted for the UK Ministry of Defence regarding its plan to buy up to 150 Joint Strike Fighters. The authors found significant overlap between final assembly and repair and estimated the costs of various final assembly options. Three of four UK sites would be suitable for JSF final assembly with investments and capability development if the technology-transfer issues can be resolved.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1771.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Innovation and Technological Leadership: Fifty Years of Competition in U.S. Aircraft R&amp;amp;D</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB52.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1998</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">Suggests that the dramatic contraction of the aerospace industry may indeed jeopardize the future design and production of innovative and cost-effective military fighter aircraft.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB52.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Expeditionary Airpower: F-15 Support Analysis : Exploring F-15 Avionics Intermediate Maintenance Concepts to Meet AEF Challenges</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19991201.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1998</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The authors examine options the Air Force might consider for F-15 avionics maintenance to work toward achieving EAF goals, comparing alternatives to each other and the current system.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19991201.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

