<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Government Legislation</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/government-legislation.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:32:55Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/government-legislation.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/government-legislation.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Provides Insight into National Flood Insurance Reform Proposals</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/gulf-states/policy-spotlights/flood-insurance-reforms.html</id>
   <published>May 18, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 18, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">FEMA&apos;s National Flood Insurance Program writes the vast majority of flood insurance on residential properties in the United States; current legislation includes a number of reforms that could strengthen the program. RAND has completed studies in four key areas that offer insight into the issues under consideration.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/gulf-states/policy-spotlights/flood-insurance-reforms.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Final Word on the NDAA</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/06/FA.html</id>
   <published>May 6, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 6, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">While I have no doubt of Levin&apos;s determination to protect the constitutional rights of American citizens, incremental adjustments and seemingly small compromises, each sensible under the circumstances, can have a cumulative effect that erodes the very liberty we are trying to protect, writes Brian Michael Jenkins.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/06/FA.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The NDAA Makes It Harder to Fight Terrorism</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/02/01/FA.html</id>
   <published>Feb 1, 2012</published>
   <updated>Feb 1, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Much of the debate over this bill has focused on the political issue of executive authority versus rule of law. In doing so it has overlooked the indirect and insidious effects the new law may have on the United States&apos; largely successful counterterrorist campaign, writes Brian Michael Jenkins.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/02/01/FA.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Spotlight on 2011</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP531-2011.html</id>
   <published>Jan 19, 2012</published>
   <updated>Jan 19, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND Europe&apos;s annual report, Spotlight 2011, focuses on selected present and past RAND Europe signature research. With 2012 being our 20th anniversary year, the report features some of our most recent work while reflecting on how RAND Europe has developed and remained relevant over the last two decades. It also highlights selected research and corporate activity in 2011.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP531-2011.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Policy Spotlight: RAND Work Provides Insight Into Federal Disaster Recovery Reforms</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/gulf-states/policy-spotlights/stafford-act-reforms.html</id>
   <published>Oct 1, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 1, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Recent proposed reforms to the Stafford Act (improving disaster recovery capability) and the National Disaster Recovery Framework (a guide to cooperation between federal agencies) cluster around five key areas where RAND has relevant studies offering additional insight and context.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/gulf-states/policy-spotlights/stafford-act-reforms.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">How Whistleblower Rule Enables Corporate Compliance</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/06/14/BGOV.html</id>
   <published>Jun 14, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jun 14, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The kerfuffle over Dodd-Frank conceals broad agreement that corporate fraud and misconduct are bad and that internal compliance mechanisms are intended to protect companies as well the community at large from bad behavior, write Michael Greenberg and Donna Boehme.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/06/14/BGOV.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Spotlight on 2010: Unlocking Innovation and Learning</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP531-2010.html</id>
   <published>Feb 3, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 3, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">With European governments seeking smart, sustainable solutions to increasingly complex challenges, innovation and learning become essential tools for good policymaking. RAND Europe&apos;s annual review, Spotlight on 2010, features many research projects that illustrate the value of learning and knowledge sharing to improve policymaking. It also provides an overview of RAND Europe&apos;s activity in 2010.  </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP531-2010.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A House Divided: Polarization and Partisanship</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/05/14/CPD.html</id>
   <published>May 14, 2010</published>
   <updated>May 14, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Certainly, ideology should play a role in public policy decisions. But when many policies&amp;mdash;regardless of their merits&amp;mdash;are simply off-limits for ideological reasons, then the nation as a whole has a problem, writes James A. Thomson.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/05/14/CPD.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Estimating the Compliance Costs for California SB1953</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20020408.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;To meet the requirements of California state law, hospitals are considering large construction programs to increase the seismic strength of their facilities. Researchers from the RAND Corporation analyzed the costs and decision making for these activities, which will produce dramatic changes in the California hospital infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20020408.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Partisan and Incumbency Effects of 1970s Congressional Redistricting</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19870801.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1986</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1986</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The authors review earlier tests and purpose several new tests of two rival hypotheses concerning the drawing of lines for congressional districts: (1) districting is partisan in nature and favors the candidates (including incumbents) of one party over those of the other, and (2) districting is bipartisan in nature and will equally favor incumbents of both parties.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19870801.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Peter B. Brownell</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/b/brownell_peter_b.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Associate Social Scientist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. in sociology, University of California, Berkeley</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/b/brownell_peter_b.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Adam Gailey</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/gailey_adam.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Assistant Policy Analyst&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. candidate, Pardee RAND Graduate School; M.S. in economics, University of Wisconsin; B.A. in mathematics and economics, Macalester College</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/gailey_adam.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Michael D. Greenberg</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/greenberg_michael.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Director, RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance; Senior Behavioral Scientist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;J.D., Harvard Law School; Ph.D. in clinical psychology, Duke University</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/greenberg_michael.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

