Judgment

Research conducted by: RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment; RAND Institute for Civil Justice

Reports (22)

Would Increased Transparency Improve the U.S. Civil Justice System? — Apr 24, 2012

Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants' privacy.

Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts and Tort Compensation — Aug 18, 2011

This book examines how state tort laws and court proceedings consider the compensation available from asbestos bankruptcy trusts and the evidence submitted in trust claim forms, and how the establishment of the trusts can affect compensation.

Third-Party Litigation Funding and Claim Transfer: Trends and Implications for the Civil Justice System — Mar 16, 2010

In July 2009, the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy convened a conference to assess the regulatory implications, effect on dispute resolution, and trends in the development of third-party litigation funding.

The U.S. Experience with No-Fault Automobile Insurance: A Retrospective — Feb 2, 2010

This monograph reviews the history of no-fault auto insurance in the United States and concludes that political support for no-fault dissipated because premium costs under no-fault have been higher than tort largely due to higher medical costs.

Securing Rights for Victims: A Process Evaluation of the National Crime Victim Law Institute's Victims' Rights Clinics — Dec 4, 2009

This book discusses how some clinics have won significant gains at the appellate and federal court levels concerning victim standing, the rights to be consulted and heard, and the right to privacy.

Insurance Class Actions in the United States — May 12, 2007

Class action lawsuits make headlines and arouse policy debates, but little is known about most of them. This book presents the results of surveys of insurers and state regulators to learn more about class litigation against insurance companies.

Asbestos Litigation — May 9, 2005

Presents the most comprehensive description to date of the longest-running mass tort litigation in U.S. history.

Capping Non-Economic Awards in Medical Malpractice Trials: California Jury Verdicts Under MICRA — Dec 17, 2004

Assesses the impact of MICRA’s limits on plaintiffs’ awards and attorneys’ fees on final judgments in medical malpractice cases

Compensation for Losses from the 9/11 Attacks — Nov 2, 2004

Examines benefits going to those who were killed or seriously injured in the 9/11 attacks and benefits to individuals and businesses in New York City that suffered losses from the attack on the World Trade Center.

Asbestos Litigation Costs and Compensation: An Interim Report — Jan 1, 2002

Examines the dimensions of current asbestos litigation and the potential future effects of the litigation on the U.S. economy

Establishing a Good-Faith Defense to Punitive-Damage Claims — Jan 1, 2000

Argues that if the main purpose of punitive damages in product liability cases is to deter conduct that results in unsafe consumer products, the threat of punitive damages ought to be better targeted at the conduct of senior management, ...

Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary — Jan 1, 1999

Class action lawsuits-allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress-have long been controversial.

Punitive Damages in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts — Jan 1, 1997

This report provides the technical details of an Institute for Civil Justice analysis of trends and patterns in punitive damage awards in financial injury cases in selected jurisdictions during the period 1985 through 1994.

Punitive Damages in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts: Executive Summary — Jan 1, 1997

This report is the executive summary of an Institute for Civil Justice analysis of trends and patterns in punitive damage awards in financial injury cases in selected jurisdictions during the period 1985 through 1994.

Punitive Damages and Financial Injury Jury Verdict — Jan 1, 1997

This publication contains the written statement of Stephen Carroll delivered on June 24, 1997, to the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate.

Trends in Civil Jury Verdicts Since 1985 — Jan 1, 1996

This report describes all civil jury verdicts reached from 1985 to 1994 in the state courts of general jurisdiction in 15 jurisdictions across the nation and identifies trends in these verdicts.

Is There a Deep-Pocket Bias in the Tort System? The Concern over Biases Against Deep-Pocket Defendants — Jan 1, 1993

There is a wide-spread perception that America's tort system is biased against so-called deep-pocket defendants. This paper summarizes what we know and don't know about deep-pocket biases.

Report Decision-Making Patterns Among Mandated Child Abuse Reporters — Jan 1, 1990

The goal of this investigation was to examine whether reporting decisions could be described by a coherent process that was consistent across incidents of suspected abuse.

Multiple damages in private antitrust suits — Jan 1, 1988

Stephen Salant's analysis of multiple damages for private antitrust suits ("Treble Damage Awards in Private Lawsuits for Price Fixing," Journal of Political Economy, December 1987) is generalized. The neutrality result that multiple damages do not af...

Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior — Jan 1, 1987

Advocates the use of systematic empirical research on civil jury behavior as an important tool in the policymaking process. The author discusses the methods that have been used for studying jury behavior,...

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended