<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Mass Torts</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/mass-torts.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:57Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/mass-torts.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/mass-torts.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Abuse of Medical Diagnostic Practices in Mass Litigation: The Case of Silica </title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR774.html</id>
   <published>Dec 2, 2009</published>
   <updated>Dec 2, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Silica inhalation injury claims skyrocketed beginning in 2001, prompting concerns that silicia litigation would become a mass tort. It instead collapsed following the uncovering of abusive diagnostic practices, which can be decreased or even prevented if changes in several areas of litigation procedures are pursued.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR774.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Group and Aggregate Litigation in the United States</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20090334.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2008</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;While a class action such as one brought under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23 is certainly the most well-known mechanism for aggregating large numbers of similar claims, other approaches include mass joinder of parties, mass consolidation of separate cases, or multidistrict litigation transfer of federal cases from across the country into a single action for pretrial processing; corporate reorganizations under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; large-scale inventories of clients controlled by a single attorney; government-initiated enforcement actions; and private attorneys general litigation brought on behalf of the general public.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20090334.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Finds Class Actions Against Insurers Rose Prior to Recent Reforms and Many Cases Occurred Outside Public View</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/04/04.html</id>
   <published>Apr 4, 2007</published>
   <updated>Apr 4, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">April 4, 2007 news release: RAND Study Finds Class Actions Against Insurers Rose Prior to Recent Reforms and Many Cases Occurred Outside Public View.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/04/04.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Anatomy of an Insurance Class Action</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9249.html</id>
   <published>Mar 13, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 13, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief describes characteristics of more than 700 class action cases against large U.S. insurers -- trends in claims, their allegations, and their outcomes -- including the vast majority of cases that never become certified as a class.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9249.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos-Related Claims Exceed 730,000, Cost More than $70 Billion</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html</id>
   <published>May 10, 2005</published>
   <updated>May 10, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Claims for asbestos injuries have risen sharply since the 1990s and total more than 730,000 through 2002.  At least 8,400 defendants have paid more than $70 billion on the litigation, 42 percent of which has gone to claimants.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Finds More Than 730,000 People Have Filed Asbestos Injury Claims in U.S., Costing Defendants More Than $70 Billion</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2005/05/10.html</id>
   <published>May 9, 2005</published>
   <updated>May 9, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND Study Finds More Than 730,000 People Have Filed Asbestos Injury Claims in U.S., Costing Defendants More Than $70 Billion</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2005/05/10.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Fashioning a National Resolution of Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation:  A Reply to Professor Brickman</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP114.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Fashioning a National Resolution of Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation:  A Reply to Professor Brickman</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP114.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos Litigation Costs and Compensation: An Interim Report</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB397.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The number of asbestos claims filed annually, the number and types of firms named as defendants in asbestos litigation, and the costs of the litigation to those defendants have all risen sharply in recent years. Given these trends, the authors examine the dimensions of asbestos litigation:  How many claims have been filed?  By whom? Against whom? For what kinds of conditions?  At what cost and with what economic effects?  And, if current trends continue, what will be the future costs of the litigation?&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB397.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Revisiting the Monster: New Myths and Realities of Class Action and Other Large Scale Litigation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP979.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">She extends her consideration of mass tort litigation to include what she terms &quot;the new social policy torts&quot;: suits against tobacco companies, firearms manufacturers, and managed care organizations that are intended to change public policy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP979.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos Litigation in the U.S.: A New Look at an Old Issue</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB362z0.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This briefing documents the first phase of a new study on asbestos litigation, now the longest-running mass tort litigation in U.S. history.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB362z0.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Beyond &quot;It Just Ain&apos;t Worth It&quot;: Alternative Strategies for Damage Class Action Reform</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP951.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">In this article, the authors explore alternative strategies for class-action reform aimed at improving the cost-benefit ratio of damage class actions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP951.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1999</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Class action lawsuits -- allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress -- have long been controversial.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1999</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Class action lawsuits-allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress-have long been controversial.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Individuals within the aggregate : relationships, representation, and fees</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP584.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">Individuals within the aggregate : relationships, representation, and fees</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP584.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A glass half full, a glass half empty : the use of alternative dispute resolution in mass personal injury litigation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP446.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1994</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">A glass half full, a glass half empty : the use of alternative dispute resolution in mass personal injury litigation</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP446.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Understanding Mass Personal Injury Litigation: A Socio-Legal Analysis</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP311.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1993</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1993</updated>
   <summary type="html">The civil justice system has not responded well to the challenge of handling mass torts, and many innovations have been proposed to improve processing of these cases.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP311.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Resolving mass toxic torts: myths and realities</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7631.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1988</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1988</updated>
   <summary type="html">Since the early 1980s, thinking about mass toxic torts has changed dramatically, and a consensus has emerged calling for substantial modifications in traditional court processes to improve the efficiency and equity of the mass claims resolution proce...</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7631.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Resolution of Mass Torts: Toward a Framework for Evaluation of Aggregative Procedures</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2805.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1987</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1987</updated>
   <summary type="html">Presents the Institute for Civil Justice&apos;s (ICJ) agenda for a program of research on mass tort litigation, and the results of ICJ work to date.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2805.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Lauren Caston</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/c/caston_lauren.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Adjunct&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. in mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles; B.A. in mathematics, University of California, Berkeley</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/c/caston_lauren.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Steven Garber</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/garber_steven.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Senior Economist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. and M.S. in economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison; B.A. in economics, University of Connecticut</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/g/garber_steven.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

