<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Military Career Field Management</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/military-career-field-management.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T20:56:06Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/military-career-field-management.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/military-career-field-management.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A New Look at Gender and Minority Differences in Officer Career Progression in the Military</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1159.html</id>
   <published>May 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND research conducted in the late 1990s documented differences in rates of promotion and retention among male, female, white, and minority officers in the U.S. military. This volume updates the earlier RAND study, using data from January 1988 through September 2010. It also examines the career progression of women serving in military occupations that are partially closed to them.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1159.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Extent of Restrictions on the Service of Active-Component Military Women</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1175.html</id>
   <published>May 21, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 21, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 mandated a review of gender-based assignment restrictions. To support this effort, RAND researchers analyzed service data to describe and quantify the military occupations that are closed to women, as well as occupations that are open with some positions that are closed.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1175.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Use of Standardized Scores in Officer Career Management and Selection</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR952.html</id>
   <published>Mar 8, 2012</published>
   <updated>Mar 8, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report provides an overview of how standardized tests are used as part of a broader selection system for each of the services at different points in an officer&apos;s career, and a discussion of key issues that should be considered when using standardized tests, including the relationship between tests and racial and ethnic group differences, which could affect minority representation within the officer corps.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR952.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Incentive Pay for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Career Fields</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1174.html</id>
   <published>Mar 6, 2012</published>
   <updated>Mar 6, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">An econometric assessment of the effectiveness of incentive pays in retaining remotely piloted aircraft pilots and sensor operators. Civilian pilot and sensor operator salaries are higher than those of other officers or enlisted personnel, indicating that incentive pays should be continued, along with reenlistment bonuses, because failure to retain enough personnel would cause serious problems with filling critical positions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1174.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Reshaping the Army&apos;s Active and Reserve Components</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG961.html</id>
   <published>Dec 15, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 15, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">To analyze policy options that would improve utilization of reserve forces, the authors assess how Army active and reserve forces are used. Converting billets from low-use to high-use career fields within a component could partially, but not completely, rebalance the reserve components. Converting billets from a low-use career field in one component to a high-use career field in another is unlikely in the near term, but an option in the long run.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG961.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Developing U.S. Army Officers&apos; Capabilities for Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Environments</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9631.html</id>
   <published>Dec 6, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 6, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Identifies and describes the knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable Army officers to succeed in joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational contexts.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9631.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Information Systems Technician Rating Stakeholders: Implications for Effective Performance</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1122.html</id>
   <published>Nov 18, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 18, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The relationships among stakeholders involved in manpower, personnel, and training processes for managing the U.S. Navy information systems technician rating are discussed. The authors examine the effects of these different stakeholders on efficiency and effectiveness measures for the information technician community in general and the Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services program specifically.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1122.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">An Organizational Design Assessment of U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1108.html</id>
   <published>Jul 13, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jul 13, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Over the past decade, U.S. Marine Corps intelligence has had to tailor its organization to meet the evolving demands of the operational environment. A broad review of its design examined how to align it efficiently and effectively with current and future missions and functions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1108.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Balancing Rated Personnel Requirements and Inventories</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR869.html</id>
   <published>May 25, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 25, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report describes a process for achieving and maintaining the balance between requirements for rated personnel and inventory. The process includes (1) recategorizing positions; (2) streamlining conversion of recategorized positions; (3) planning for effects of major actions on rated requirements; (4) redesigning positions to concentrate tasks requiring rated expertise in fewer rated positions; (5) making aircrew management more responsive.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR869.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Air Force Contingency Contracting: Reachback and Other Opportunities for Improvement</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR862.html</id>
   <published>Mar 31, 2011</published>
   <updated>Mar 31, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Examines &quot;reachback&quot; -- the use of contracting capability outside of the theater of operations to accomplish contracting tasks for customers in-theater -- as a potential means for reducing the deployment burden on military contracting personnel. The authors find that reachback might improve performance in some areas and has the potential to reduce deployments, but other issues also need to be addressed to reduce stress on the contracting career field.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR862.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Developing U.S. Army Officers&apos; Capabilities for Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Environments</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG990.html</id>
   <published>Feb 10, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 10, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Based on interviews and focus groups, this monograph identifies and describes the knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable Army officers to succeed in joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational contexts. Researchers identified the kinds of assignments that develop the needed capabilities and used inventory modeling to assess the Army&apos;s ability to develop and maintain a cadre of properly qualified officers. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG990.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Targeting the Occupational Skill Pairings Needed in New Air Force Colonels</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR759.html</id>
   <published>Oct 7, 2010</published>
   <updated>Oct 7, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Air Force needs to develop a second occupational competency, or paired skill, in many of its future colonels and generals. The authors report how a team of Air Force officers and RAND staff derived the minimum percentage of each occupation&apos;s future new colonels who should have each paired skill. The minimums could help occupational overseers guide appropriate numbers of officers into appropriate paired skills.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR759.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Harry J. Thie</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/t/thie_harry_j.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Senior Management Scientist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. in business administration, The George Washington University; M.S. in industrial management, Georgia Institute of Technology; B.A. in history, Saint Bonaventure University</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/t/thie_harry_j.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">S. Craig Moore</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/m/moore_s_craig.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Senior Operations Researcher; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ph.D. in operations research, Southern Methodist University; M.S. in operations research, Columbia University; B.A. in mathematics, Wesleyan University</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/m/moore_s_craig.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Henry A. Leonard</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/l/leonard_henry_a.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Senior Defense Research Analyst&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;M.P.A. in economics and public policy, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University; B.S. in public affairs, United States Military Academy, West Point</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/l/leonard_henry_a.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Raymond E. Conley</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/c/conley_raymond_e.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Associate Director, Manpower, Personnel, and Training Program, RAND Project AIR FORCE; Senior Management Scientist; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;D.P.A. (doctorate of public administration), University of Alabama; M.S. in industrial engineering, Arizona State University; M.S. in resource strategy, Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University; M.B.A., Louisiana Tech University; B.A. in industrial production, University of Oklahoma</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/c/conley_raymond_e.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Evaluating Navy&apos;s Funded Graduate Education Program: A Return-on-Investment Framework</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG995.html</id>
   <published>Aug 3, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 3, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sending officers to graduate schools is costly to the services. While officers incur specific service requirements in return, does that recoup the investment? The authors found that, in the U.S. Navy, breaking even financially is not always realistic. But the skills and general knowledge that officers gain in the process extend the value of their degrees beyond their majors, particularly in careers leading to flag rank.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG995.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test: Validity, Fairness, and Bias</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR744.html</id>
   <published>May 10, 2010</published>
   <updated>May 10, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Air Force relies on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) as part of its officer selection process. Despite concerns about the test, the authors conclude that it is a good selection test that predicts important Air Force outcomes and is not biased against minorities or women. The Air Force would not benefit by replacing the AFOQT with the SAT, although other valid selection tools could be used to complement the AFOQT.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR744.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Officer Classification and the Future of Diversity Among Senior Military Leaders: A Case Study of the Army ROTC</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR731.html</id>
   <published>Sep 28, 2009</published>
   <updated>Sep 28, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The relative lack of minorities in certain military career fields has a significant impact on the diversity of the senior leadership. The relationship between career field choice, race/ethnicity, and membership in the senior officer corps appears to stem, at least in part, from racial and ethnic differences in the occupational preferences of officer cadets. The authors urge a full-scale study to learn the reasons behind these preferences.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR731.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Computer Simulation of General and Flag Officer Management: Model Description and Results</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR702.html</id>
   <published>Aug 6, 2009</published>
   <updated>Aug 6, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;A RAND simulation model adapted to address general and flag officer management subject to provisions of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 assesses the complexity and feasibility of managing new end- and grade-strength accounting rules. The model schedules assignments, holds positions open as needed, and forecasts retirements and promotions. The results indicate that GFO end-strength management is tractable.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR702.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

