Military Command and Control

To accomplish their missions, military leaders must be able to command and control the many activities of their forces. RAND has applied strategic analysis since its earliest work on game theory to develop scenarios and guide military and civilian decisionmakers on the most effective employment of command and control (C2) principles and technologies, and continues to do so with C4I (command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence).

Research conducted by: RAND Arroyo Center; RAND Project AIR FORCE; RAND National Security Research Division

All Items (15)

RESEARCH BRIEF

Addressing Commanders' Needs for Information on "Soft" Factors — Dec 5, 2011

Describes a framework for thinking about commanders' critical information needs in countersurgency operations and offers practical ways for commanders to integrate influence activities into combined arms planning and assessment.

RESEARCH BRIEF

Standing Up a More Capable Joint Task Force Headquarters — Nov 18, 2011

The U.S. Army needs to improve its ability to command and control joint, interagency, and multinational forces in diverse environments, and to prepare Army headquarters to perform as components of, or headquarters for, joint task forces.

REPORT

Enhancing Army Joint Force Headquarters Capabilities — Jul 7, 2010

The research in this document is aimed at helping the Army improve its ability to command and control joint, interagency, and multinational forces to accomplish diverse missions in a range of settings. A particular emphasis was placed on suggesting innovative ways to prepare Army headquarters, including Divisions, Corps, and Theater Armies, to perform as components of, or headquarters for, joint task forces.

REPORT

Understanding Commanders' Information Needs for Influence Operations — Nov 22, 2009

In order to improve the effectiveness of combined arms planning and assessment operations, ground commanders need information pertaining to cultural and other "soft" factors and practical ways to integrate such information into influence operations activities.

REPORT

Controlling the Cost of C4I Upgrades on Naval Ships — Sep 14, 2009

C4I systems have evolved rapidly over the last few decades, and the cost of keeping these products up-to-date on new and in-service U.S. Navy ships is high due to configuration, integration, testing, and other challenges. Looking across a specific set of completed C4I upgrades, the authors found evidence of cost improvement, a high level of variability in costs, and a trend toward overestimating the installation-labor costs of certain…

COMMENTARY

Changes From Command Transfer — Dec 6, 2006

Published commentary by RAND staff: Changes From Command Transfer, in Korea Times.

REPORT

Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces: Expanded Operational Architecture for Combat Support Execution Planning and Control — Aug 31, 2006

As part of a series on supporting the Air and Space Expeditionary Force, this report looks at the current operational architecture for incorporating combat support command and control (CSC2) and proposes an expanded architecture for the future.

REPORT

Improving the Army Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES): The Programming Phase — Jan 1, 1999

The principal objective in this work was to improve the Army's Program Objective Memorandum (POM) development process.

REPORT

Command and Control of Joint Air Operations: Some Lessons Learned from Four Case Studies of an Enduring Issue — Dec 31, 1990

Examines the achievement of the principle of unity of effort from a narrow focus on the command and control of U.S. joint tactical air operations in four campaigns (Midway, the Solomons, Korea, and Vietnam) from 1942 to 1968...

PEOPLE

Cortez A. Cooper

Senior International Policy Analyst
M.A. in Asian Studies, University of Hawaii; B.A. in psychology, Davidson College

PEOPLE

Daniel Gonzales

Senior Physical Scientist; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School
Ph.D. in theoretical physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; B.S. in physics, Stanford University

PEOPLE

John Matsumura

Senior Engineer; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School
Ph.D. in engineering and public policy, Carnegie Mellon University; M.S. in engineering mechanics, Pennsylvania State University; B.S. in aerospace engineering, Pennsylvania Sate University

PEOPLE

Louis R. Moore

Senior Operations Researcher; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School
Ph.D. and M.S. in mathematical statistics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; B.S. in mathematics, Villanova University

PEOPLE

Walter L. Perry

Senior Information Scientist; Professor, Pardee RAND Graduate School
Ph.D. in information technology, George Mason University; M.S. in operations research, Tulane University; M.B.A. in management science, Tulane University; B.A. in mathematics and economics, Northeastern University

PEOPLE

Robert S. Tripp

Senior Management Scientist
Ph.D. in business administration, University of Minnesota; M.S. in business administration, B.S. in metallurgical engineering, Michigan Technological University

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended