<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Military Ships and Naval Vessels</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/military-ships-and-naval-vessels.xml"/>
     <updated>2013-05-22T17:18:13Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/military-ships-and-naval-vessels.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2013, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/military-ships-and-naval-vessels.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Atlantic Monthly and RAND View the Future</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/08/01/AM.html</id>
   <published>Aug 1, 2003</published>
   <updated>Aug 1, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Atlantic Monthly Magazine features a compilation of ten short essays written by experts at RAND, collectively titled Headlines Over the Horizon. The RAND authors examined developments in international and military affairs drawing little attention today that are expected to be major issues in the next three to five years.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/08/01/AM.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Beware Beijing&apos;s Military Ambitions</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2005/08/07/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Aug 7, 2005</published>
   <updated>Aug 7, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2005/08/07/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Navy Should Start Next Nuclear Submarine Design Phase Early to Prevent Engineering Brain Drain, RAND Study Finds</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/05/07.html</id>
   <published>May 7, 2007</published>
   <updated>May 7, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">May 7, 2007 news release: Navy Should Start Next Nuclear Submarine Design Phase Early to Prevent Engineering Brain Drain, RAND Study Finds.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/05/07.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Issues New Study on Australia&apos;s Submarine Design Capabilities and Capacities</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/12/15.html</id>
   <published>Dec 15, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 15, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">When it comes to designing a new submarine, Australia has considerable expertise, but some gaps still exist.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/12/15.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Industry and Infrastructure for Future Submarines: An International Perspective</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP622.html</id>
   <published>Jan 28, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 28, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Draws from RAND&apos;s international submarine experience to discuss the benefits of long-range planning, ways to improve efficiency, the need to sustain hard-to-replace resources, the importance of testing, and potential policy implications for Australia as the Commonwealth plans to build its new submarine.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP622.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Framework for Quantifying Uncertainty in Electric Ship Design</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB407.html</id>
   <published>Dec 20, 2004</published>
   <updated>Dec 20, 2004</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;To help the Navy assess the benefits of electric drive propulsion for naval vessels, RAND has developed a framework for assessing key technological components, such as motors, generators, and power electronics. This documented briefing outlines the approach the authors developed for making such assessments suggests how this information can be integrated to assess the affects on overall ship performance.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB407.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing the Benefits and Costs of a Science Submarine</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1369z0.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2001</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Assessing the Benefits and Costs of a Science Submarine</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1369z0.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Concept of Operations for a New Deep-Diving Submarine</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395.html</id>
   <published>Apr 29, 2002</published>
   <updated>Apr 29, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">Develops concepts for a deep-diving research submarine&apos;s possible replacement platform, analyzing which military and scientific missions should have the highest priority.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Concept of Operations for a New Deep-Diving Submarine: Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395z1.html</id>
   <published>Apr 29, 2002</published>
   <updated>Apr 29, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;By 2012, the U.S. Navy&apos;s deep-diving research submarine&apos;s reactor will be exhausted, making it necessary to refuel the reactor or replace the submarine. If the Navy opts for a new submarine, what would be its vital missions and what would it need to perform them?  This executive summary of MR-1395 encapsulates the authors&apos; work with scientists, defense experts, and the Navy to develop a concept of operation for a new platform, analyzing which missions should have the highest priority.  They conclude with a list of highest-priority missions and two design concepts best able to achieve them.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Royal Navy&apos;s New-Generation Type 45 Destroyer: Acquisition Options and Implications</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1486.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2002</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">In 2001, RAND helped the United Kingdom&apos;s Ministry of Defence (MOD) evaluate different acquisition strategies that it might use to acquire the new-generation Type 45 destroyer.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1486.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Options for Funding Aircraft Carriers</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1526.html</id>
   <published>Jun 1, 2002</published>
   <updated>Jun 1, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The present practice of fully funding aircraft carriers in a single year causes spikes of several billion dollars in the budget every fourth or fifth year, and it complicates the funding of other programs in those years. RAND assessed the advantages and disadvantages of three alternative strategies: incremental funding, advance appropriations, and a revolving fund.  Each strategy can reduce budget spikes but introduces other risks to each participant in the budgeting process: the Navy, DoD, and Congress.  No strategy was found to be clearly superior.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1526.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Stryker Brigade Combat Team: Rethinking Strategic Responsiveness and Assessing Deployment Options</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1606.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2002</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">Examines alternative means to decrease the deployment time for the new Army medium-weight brigade, comparing air and sealift from the United States with air and fast (but short-range) sealift from forward bases or preposition sites. Historical experience and an assessment of U.S. regional interests are used to determine how much warning time the United States typically has before major force deployments and where it is most likely to deploy such forces.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1606.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS Nimitz (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1632.html</id>
   <published>Apr 1, 2002</published>
   <updated>Apr 1, 2002</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The midlife refueling/complex overhaul (RCOH) of the USS Nimitz (CVN 68) took five years to plan and three years to execute. Numerous budget and work-requirements changes and a four-month labor-union strike during the overhaul caused the project&apos;s completion to slip and resulted in significant cost growth.  This report analyzes the planning and execution of the CVN 68 RCOH to identify changes in processes and procedures that could lead to better cost and schedule performance for the nine remaining Nimitz-class RCOHs.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1632.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Strategic Futures: Evolving Missions for Traditional Strategic Delivery Vehicles</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR375.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1995</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">Addresses the post-Cold War use of traditional U.S. strategic nuclear forces (nuclear-armed long-range bombers, ICBMs, and submarine-launched ballistic missiles) from three perspectives:  top-down, bottom-up, and policy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR375.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The U.S. Submarine Production Base: An Analysis of Cost, Schedule, and Risk for Selected Force Structures</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR456.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1994</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In January 1993, the RAND National Defense Research Institute was asked by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition to compare the practicality and cost of two approaches to future submarine production: (1) allowing production to shut down as currently programmed submarines are finished, then restarting it when more are needed, and (2) continuing low-rate production.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR456.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The U.S. Submarine Production Base: An Analysis of Cost, Schedule, and Risk for Selected Force Structures:  Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR456z1.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1994</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In January 1993, the OSD asked RAND to compare the practicality and cost of two approaches to future submarine production: (1) allowing production to shut down as currently programmed submarines are finished, then restarting it when more are needed, and (2) continuing low-rate production. This report is a summary of RAND&amp;rsquo;s analysis, the results obtained, and the associated uncertainties. A full report appears in MR-456-OSD.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR456z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The U.S. Aircraft Carrier Industrial Base: Force  Structure, Cost, Schedule, and Technology Issues for CVN77</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR948.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1998</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Aircraft Carrier Industrial Base:  Force  Structure, Cost, Schedule, and Technology Issues for CVN77</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR948.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Navy Network Dependability: Models, Metrics, and Tools</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1003.html</id>
   <published>Aug 6, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 6, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Navy is increasingly dependent on networks and associated net-centric operations to conduct military missions, so a vital goal is to establish and maintain dependable networks for ship and multiship networks. The authors develop a framework for measuring the dependability of naval networks and describe a software tool for modeling the impact that individual network components have on overall mission operational availability.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1003.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Australia Has Considerable Expertise in Submarine Design, but Gaps Still Exist</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1033.html</id>
   <published>Dec 15, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 15, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Royal Australian Navy intends to acquire 12 new submarines to replace its &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt;-class vessels. RAND assessed the domestic engineering and design skills that Australian industry and government will need to design the new submarine, identified the skills they currently possess, and evaluated how to fill any gaps between the two.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1033.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Effects of Changing Aircraft Carrier Procurement Schedules</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1073.html</id>
   <published>Mar 21, 2011</published>
   <updated>Mar 21, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Secretary of Defense&apos;s plans to shift Navy aircraft carrier acquisition to every five years should have little impact on force structure and the industrial base in the next decade&amp;mdash;but after that, the force structure shrinks, as does the chance of meeting goals for the number of deployed aircraft carriers. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1073.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>
