<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Missile Defense</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/missile-defense.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:49:21Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/missile-defense.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/missile-defense.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">NATO&apos;s Shrinking Resources</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/17/IHT.html</id>
   <published>May 16, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 16, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">At a time when the European Union faces mounting economic and political challenges, maintaining a strong, vibrant Atlantic alliance is more important than ever, write F. Stephen Larrabee and Peter A. Wilson.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/17/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Kremlin&apos;s Bold Missile Defense Gambit</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/01/27/MT.html</id>
   <published>Jan 27, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 27, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Russia&apos;s proposal for joint missile defense represents a potential game-changer for the Kremlin&apos;s relations with the West, writes Andrew Weiss.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/01/27/MT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">PRGS 2010 Defense Seminar Brochure</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP381-2010-06.html</id>
   <published>Jun 9, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jun 9, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;New Security Challenges,&amp;rdquo; an intensive weeklong program offered by the Pardee RAND Graduate School, equips participants with both an understanding of the most critical current policy challenges and the most up-to-date analytical techniques for addressing them. The program aims to give participants both knowledge and tools they can employ upon their return to their organizations. This brochure describes the 2010 program, course offerings, and faculty.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP381-2010-06.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND&apos;s Portfolio Analysis Tool (PAT): Theory, Methods, and Reference Manual</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR756.html</id>
   <published>Nov 19, 2009</published>
   <updated>Nov 19, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;PAT was designed to facilitate strategic analysis dealing with uncertainty and differences of perspective. It enables an approach to analysis oriented toward assisting high-level decisionmakers to frame their thinking about balance, to construct good multifaceted options for consideration, and to make subsequent choices.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR756.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Biden&apos;s Task in Eastern Europe: Reassurance</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/10/20/CSM.html</id>
   <published>Oct 19, 2009</published>
   <updated>Oct 19, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vice President Joseph Biden&apos;s trip to eastern Europe this week provides an important opportunity to reassure Poland, the Czech Republic, and Romania that the U.S. is committed to their security. This reassurance is needed, especially in the wake of the decision to cancel the deployment of missile defense installations in the region, write F. Stephen Larrabee and Christopher S. Chivvis.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/10/20/CSM.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Right Move in Europe: Improved Opportunities with NATO, Russia</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/09/22/WT.html</id>
   <published>Sep 21, 2009</published>
   <updated>Sep 21, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Obama&apos;s decision to alter course on missile defense was the right choice. Those who call it a capitulation to Russia are wrong, and it plays into Russia&apos;s hands to portray the decision in that manner. But the change of course will have to be complemented with more appropriate initiatives, writes Christopher S. Chivvis.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/09/22/WT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Real Threats, Real Fears, Real Defenses</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/09/21/IHT.html</id>
   <published>Sep 20, 2009</published>
   <updated>Sep 20, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Critics of the Bush administration missile defense plans for Central Europe have charged that the U.S. would be deploying defenses that did not work against a threat that did not exist. It would also defend countries not threatened by Iran, while leaving Iran&apos;s more likely victims entirely uncovered, writes James Dobbins.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/09/21/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">No Surprise in Failure to Deter North Korea</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/02/CT.html</id>
   <published>Jun 4, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jun 4, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;North Korea&apos;s latest misbehavior highlights an uncomfortable truth: the failure of the United States and the international community to deter its actions. In this case, it is pretty easy to see why North Korea has not been deterred, writes Bruce Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/02/CT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">How Not to Promote American Missile Defense in Europe</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/04/27/PS.html</id>
   <published>Apr 27, 2007</published>
   <updated>Apr 27, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: How Not to Promote American Missile Defense in Europe, in Project Syndicate--an association that distributes commentaries to 291 newspapers in 115 countries.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/04/27/PS.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Missile Defense: Avoiding a Crisis in Europe</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/03/29/IHT.html</id>
   <published>Mar 29, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 29, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: Missile Defense: Avoiding a Crisis in Europe, in International Herald Tribune.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/03/29/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Portfolio-Analysis Tool for Missile Defense (PAT-MD): Methodology and User&amp;rsquo;s Manual</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR262.html</id>
   <published>Oct 18, 2005</published>
   <updated>Oct 18, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Describes the methodology of RAND&amp;rsquo;s Portfolio-Analysis Tool for Missile Defense (PAT-MD), developed to facilitate high-level discussion of program tradeoffs and adjustments in the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). PAT-MD provides five scoring and aggregation methods for obtaining summary portfolio-style characterizations of alternative investment options. It also enables &amp;ldquo;zooming&amp;rdquo; to higher levels of detail to understand the basis of characterizations and how they would change if assumptions or priorities were changed. The report also serves as a user&amp;rsquo;s guide to PAT-MD.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR262.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Challenge for NATO&apos;s Chairman</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2005/03/10/FCM.html</id>
   <published>Mar 10, 2005</published>
   <updated>Mar 10, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2005/03/10/FCM.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Army Air and Missile Defense: Future Challenges</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB335.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt; No one knows what the world will look like in 25 years, but the U.S. Army must take steps now if it is to defend itself against future enemies, no matter what the world looks like. This briefing examines six future scenarios and looks at potential areas of air and missile defense shortfalls.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB335.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Nothing&apos;s Free in Dealing with Putin</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/08/01/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Aug 1, 2001</published>
   <updated>Aug 1, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/08/01/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Burst of Agenda-Setting Will Disarm Europeans for Bush</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/06/06/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Jun 6, 2001</published>
   <updated>Jun 6, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/06/06/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">There&apos;s a Better Way to Missile Defense</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/05/03/LAT.html</id>
   <published>May 3, 2001</published>
   <updated>May 3, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/05/03/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The China and Nuclear Reunion Is Only a Motive Away</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/02/24/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Feb 24, 2001</published>
   <updated>Feb 24, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/02/24/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Tiptoeing Into Europe&apos;s Briar Patch</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/02/01/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Feb 1, 2001</published>
   <updated>Feb 1, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/02/01/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Foreign Policy Minefield Dictates Starting Slowly</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/01/08/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Jan 8, 2001</published>
   <updated>Jan 8, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/01/08/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1374.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2001</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1374.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

