National Defence

RAND conducts a broad array of national security research for the U.S. Department of Defense and allied ministries of defense. RAND's three U.S. federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) explore topics from acquisition and technology to personnel and readiness.

Research conducted by: RAND Arroyo Center; RAND National Security Research Division; RAND Project AIR FORCE; RAND Europe; Homeland Security and Defense Center; Military Health Policy Research; Invisible Wounds of War Project; Center for Global Risk and Security

All Items (4225)

Report

U.S. Global Defense Posture, 1783–2011 — Jan 14, 2013

The evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present offers important lessons for dealing with similar problems in the future.

Commentary

Book Review: 'The Outpost: An Untold Story of American Valor' by Jake Tapper — Jan 12, 2013

Tapper spends too much time providing tactical details of battles and too little offering a nuanced, thoughtful explanation of why the U.S. Army struggled so much in Nuristan, writes Seth G. Jones.

Commentary

Moving Beyond Afghanistan's Soviet Legacy — Jan 10, 2013

In 2014, Afghanistan will hold its third presidential election since the fall of the Taliban. If the country can hold reasonably free and fair elections, and defeated candidates can agree to step aside, Afghanistan has a chance of moving beyond its Soviet legacy, writes Seth G. Jones.

Report

Adapting the Army's Training and Leader Development Programs for Future Challenges — Jan 10, 2013

Examines the adequacy of overall Army Training and Leader Development (ALTD) management processes, identifies areas for improvement, and develops directions that the Army could take to improve its ATLD management process.

Blog

A Cybercrisis Is Inevitable — and Manageable — Jan 9, 2013

The United States can manage a cybercrisis by taking steps to reduce the incentives for other states to step into crisis, by controlling the narrative, understanding the stability parameters of the crises, and trying to manage escalation if conflicts arise.

Commentary

A Matter of Degree: Who Can Authorize a Cyberattack? — Jan 9, 2013

Understanding when the United States should engage in cyberwar and who should approve cyberattacks requires understanding that cyberwar has multiple personalities: operational, strategic, and that great gray area in-between., writes Martin Libicki.

Report

A Gap Analysis of Life Cycle Management Commands and Best Purchasing and Supply Management Organizations — Jan 7, 2013

Reviews the Army's achievements in implementing best purchasing and supply management practices and describes how this progress compares with that of leading commercial enterprises.

Report

Employer Partnership Program Analysis of Alternatives — Jan 7, 2013

Examines features of the U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard's Employer Partnership Program, which seeks to strengthen relationships with reservists and their civilian employers.

Report

Cybercrises Can Be Managed with Multiple Strategies — Jan 4, 2013

The chances are growing that the United States will find itself in a crisis in cyberspace. Such crises can be managed by taking steps to reduce the incentives for other states to step into crisis, by controlling the narrative, understanding the stability parameters of the crises, and trying to manage escalation if conflicts arise from crises.

Commentary

Sanctions Squeeze Revolutionary Guard — Jan 4, 2013

Iran's inability to sell its oil due to sanctions will not only shrink the resources available to the Guard as a military force, but will crimp the wealth of individual Guard officers. This could erode the Guard's loyalty to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, writes Alireza Nader.

Commentary

Al Qaeda Threat to U.S. Embassy in Yemen Raises Questions — Jan 4, 2013

As in most war zones and high threat environments, one of the dangers to guard against is complacency...people become accustomed to a certain level of danger and assume that they have everything under control, when in fact they may have not fully thought through the problems posed by an enemy that is continually innovating, writes William Young.

Commentary

Iran: A Rough Year in 2013 — Jan 2, 2013

The Islamic Republic faces the potential of stronger economic sanctions and even a military strike because of its intransigence in complying with U.N. resolutions on its nuclear program. It also must deal with twin domestic challenges—deepening malaise among the young and increasing tensions among the political elite, writes Alireza Nader.

Commentary

The Mirage of the Arab Spring — Jan 1, 2013

Like it or not, the United States counts among its allies a number of authoritarian Arab countries, and they are essential partners in protecting its interests, writes Seth G. Jones. The normative hope that liberal democracy may flourish in the future must be balanced by the need to work with governments and societies as they exist today.

Journal Article

Considering Al-Qa'ida's Innovation Doctrine: From Strategic Texts to "Innovation in Practice" — Jan 1, 2013

Understanding how terrorist groups innovate and adapt is key for anticipating future shifts in terrorist threats.

Journal Article

Taking Disaster Seriously: East Asian Military Involvement in International Disaster Relief Operations and the Implications for Force Projection — Jan 1, 2013

The participation of East Asian militaries (Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea) in international disaster relief is a relatively new phenomenon having many implications that will shape the global landscape of the 21st century.

Journal Article

Mental Health Treatment Experiences of U.S. Service Members Previously Deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan — Jan 1, 2013

This study examined the mental health treatment experiences of active-duty U.S. service members who received treatment from primary care or specialty mental health providers.

Journal Article

The Future of Insurgency — Jan 1, 2013

What are key historical trends in insurgencies? And what do these finding suggest about the future of insurgency? We examine four aspects: causes of insurgency, outside support, strategies, and tactics.

Commentary

New 'Rule Book' to Set Parameters for Targeted Killings — Dec 31, 2012

A constrictive rule book against direct-action counterterrorism techniques could be in tension with operational realities. But it would go some way toward establishing the legal and ethical framework under which such difficult decisions are made, writes Patrick Johnston.

Blog

Counter Terrorism Through Diplomatic Goals — Dec 27, 2012

At RAND's Politics Aside event, former Saudi Intelligence chief Prince Turki Al Faisal, RAND senior political scientist Seth Jones, and others talk with Reuters columnist David Rohde about strategies for dealing with terrorism.

Commentary

Big Defense Cuts Are Coming, Regardless of the Fiscal Cliff — Dec 27, 2012

The prudent approach is to decide on a strategic direction that provides a framework for prioritizing which forces and equipment the United States should preserve and determining which can be trimmed or eliminated with limited risk to security, write Stuart Johnson and Irv Blickstein.

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended