<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: New York City</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/new-york-city.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:57:11Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/new-york-city.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/new-york-city.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">National Evaluation of Safe Start Promising Approaches: Assessing Program Outcomes</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR991-1.html</id>
   <published>Jan 4, 2012</published>
   <updated>Jan 4, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Safe Start Promising Approaches (SSPA) is the second phase of a community-based initiative focused on developing and fielding interventions to prevent and reduce the impact of children&apos;s exposure to violence. This report shares the results of SSPA, which was intended to implement and evaluate promising and evidence-based programs in 15 program sites across the country.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR991-1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Micropolitics of Implementing a School-Based Bonus Policy: The Case of New York City&apos;s Compensation Committees</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20120064.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2012</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article examines the micropolitics of implementing New York City&apos;s Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program and school governance bodies (Compensation Committees) that determined distribution of school-level rewards among personnel.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20120064.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">What Are Achievement Gains Worth -- to Teachers?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP201100247.html</id>
   <published>Nov 30, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 30, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html"></summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP201100247.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Debate over Teacher Merit Pay: A Freakonomics Quorum</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/09/20/FRK.html</id>
   <published>Sep 20, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 20, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Motivation alone does not improve schools. Even if incentives inspire staff to improve practices or work together, educators may not have the capacity or resources to bring about improvement, writes Julie Marsh.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/09/20/FRK.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New York City School-Based Financial Incentives Program Did Not Improve Student Achievement or Affect Reported Teaching Practices</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/07/18.html</id>
   <published>Jul 17, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jul 17, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">A New York City program designed to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives for teachers did not improve student achievement, most likely because it did not change teacher behavior and the conditions needed to motivate staff were not achieved.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/07/18.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">NYC School-Based Financial Incentives Program Did Not Improve Student Achievement or Affect Reported Teaching Practices</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1114.html</id>
   <published>Jul 17, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jul 17, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">A New York City program designed to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives for teachers did not improve student achievement, most likely because it did not change teacher behavior and the conditions needed to motivate staff were not achieved.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1114.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">What New York City&apos;s Experiment with Schoolwide Performance Bonuses Tells Us About Pay for Performance</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9596.html</id>
   <published>Jul 17, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jul 17, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">New York City&apos;s Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program did not improve student achievement at any grade level, perhaps in part because it provided no significant additional motivation beyond other accountability incentives.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9596.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Coordination Efforts Could Boost After-School Programming</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1037.html</id>
   <published>Oct 21, 2010</published>
   <updated>Oct 21, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Coordinating the work of the many different institutions involved in after-school activities&#8212;including schools, nonprofits and municipal agencies like parks and libraries&#8212;holds the promise of making programs better and more accessible to urban children and teens who need them.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1037.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Coordination Efforts Could Boost After-School Programming</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2010/10/21.html</id>
   <published>Oct 20, 2010</published>
   <updated>Oct 20, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Coordinating the work of the many different institutions involved in after-school activities -- including schools, nonprofits and municipal agencies like parks and libraries -- holds the promise of making programs better and more accessible to urban children and teens who need them.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2010/10/21.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Hours of Opportunity: How Cities Can Use Data to Improve Services in Out-of-School Time Programs</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9551z1.html</id>
   <published>Oct 19, 2010</published>
   <updated>Oct 19, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Five cities that received a grant from The Wallace Foundation, along with three other cities that were not part of the initiative, were successful in using data from management information systems to improve out-of-school-time programs.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9551z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Hours of Opportunity: How Cities Can Build Systems to Improve Out-of-School-Time Programs</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9551.html</id>
   <published>Oct 18, 2010</published>
   <updated>Oct 18, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Five cities that received a grant from The Wallace Foundation to increase collaboration, access, quality, information sharing, and sustainability in their out-of-school-time systems used different planning approaches to meet the initiative&apos;s goals.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9551.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Hours of Opportunity, Volume 3: Profiles of Five Cities Improving After-School Programs Through a Systems Approach</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR882.html</id>
   <published>Sep 27, 2010</published>
   <updated>Sep 27, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Wallace Foundation sponsored an initiative to help five cities increase collaboration, access, quality, information sharing, and sustainability in their out-of-school-time (OST) systems. The third in this three-volume series presents in-depth case studies of the grantees (Providence, Boston, New York City, Chicago, and Washington, D.C.) and reveals lessons learned and best practices for the OST field.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR882.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Hours of Opportunity, Volume 2: The Power of Data to Improve After-School Programs Citywide</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1037z1.html</id>
   <published>Sep 13, 2010</published>
   <updated>Sep 13, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Wallace Foundation sponsored an initiative to help five cities increase collaboration, access, quality, information sharing, and sustainability in their out-of-school-time systems. The second in this three-volume series describes how Wallace Foundation grantees and three other cities used management information systems to collect and use data on out-of-school-time programs, including enrollment, attendance, and student outcomes.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1037z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Review: Vol. 33, No. 3, Winter 2009-2010</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP22-2009-12.html</id>
   <published>Dec 23, 2009</published>
   <updated>Dec 23, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Features focus on stabilization missions, grade retention, health financing, and RAND&apos;s president; other items discuss the European Union, sodium, health insurance, retail medical clinics, energy efficiency, disaster recovery, and alcohol pricing.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP22-2009-12.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New York City&apos;s School Promotion and Retention Policy Shows Positive Results for Students</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2009/10/15.html</id>
   <published>Oct 15, 2009</published>
   <updated>Oct 15, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">The New York City Department of Education&apos;s test-based promotion and retention policy, which identifies and provides support for struggling students, has demonstrated positive effects for student achievement in fifth grade that continue into seventh grade.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2009/10/15.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Ending Social Promotion Without Leaving Children Behind: The Case of New York City</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG894.html</id>
   <published>Oct 14, 2009</published>
   <updated>Oct 14, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The New York City Department of Education&apos;s test-based promotion and retention policy, which identifies and provides support for struggling students, has demonstrated positive effects for student achievement in fifth grade that continue into seventh grade.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG894.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Ending Social Promotion in New York City Public Schools Without Leaving Children Behind</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9470.html</id>
   <published>Oct 9, 2009</published>
   <updated>Oct 9, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RAND researchers conducted a three-year study of New York City&apos;s promotion policy, using interviews, case studies, student surveys, and demographic and test score data to determine its effects on the outcomes of 5th-grade students held to the policy.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9470.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Retaining Students in Grade: A Literature Review of the Effects of Retention on Students&apos; Academic and Nonacademic Outcomes</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR678.html</id>
   <published>Sep 10, 2009</published>
   <updated>Sep 10, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In 2003&amp;ndash;2004, the New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE) implemented a new promotion policy for 3rd-grade students, which was later extended to 5th, 7th, and 8th graders. NYCDOE asked RAND to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation to provide evidence of the program&apos;s impact on 5th graders. This report, one in a series documenting the results of the study, identifies and reviews the literature on grade retention.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR678.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Retaining Students in Grade: Lessons Learned Regarding Policy Design and Implementation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR677.html</id>
   <published>Sep 10, 2009</published>
   <updated>Sep 10, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In 2003&amp;ndash;2004, the New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE) implemented a new promotion policy for 3rd-grade students, which was later extended to 5th, 7th, and 8th graders. This report, one in a series, identifies lessons learned about policy design and implementation through interviews with top-level administrators who oversee promotion and retention policies in states and districts with K&amp;ndash;8 policies and programs that are similar to those in NYC.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR677.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Ending Social Promotion: Examining the Effects of NYC&apos;s 5th-Grade Promotion Policy</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2009/10/19/ending_social_promotion.html</id>
   <published>Jan 18, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jan 18, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In this Congressional Briefing held on October 19, 2009, researchers Jennifer McCombs and Lou Mariano discuss RAND&apos;s recently published evaluation of a test-based promotion policy implemented by the New York City Department of Education. The findings will be of interest as many states and school districts are implementing test-based requirements for promotion at key transitional points in students&apos; schooling careers, thus ending the practice of promoting students who have failed to meet academic standards and requirements for that grade.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2009/10/19/ending_social_promotion.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

