<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: North Korea</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/north-korea.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-17T00:41:00Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/north-korea.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/north-korea.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Book by Noted Expert Proposes a Renaissance of Thought on Nuclear Deterrence for Today&apos;s Strategic Environment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1103.html</id>
   <published>Apr 17, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 17, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">A new book by the late French scholar Th&amp;eacute;r&amp;egrave;se Delpech provides a critical review and update of nuclear deterrence theory, focusing a critical eye on nuclear issues during the Cold War, examining the lessons of past nuclear crises, and outlining ways in which these lessons apply to major nuclear powers and nuclear pretenders today.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1103.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Book by Noted Expert Proposes a Renaissance of Thought on Nuclear Deterrence for Today&apos;s Strategic Environment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/17.html</id>
   <published>Apr 17, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 17, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">A new book by the late French scholar Th&amp;eacute;r&amp;egrave;se Delpech provides a critical review and update of nuclear deterrence theory, focusing a critical eye on nuclear issues during the Cold War, examining the lessons of past nuclear crises, and outlining ways in which these lessons apply to major nuclear powers and nuclear pretenders today.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/17.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">North Korea: Uncertain and Dangerous Times Ahead</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/12/21/RAND.html</id>
   <published>Dec 21, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 21, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">With his father&apos;s support over the last year, Kim Jong-Un has tried to rapidly reshape the North Korean leadership structure, giving him many new subordinates who are untried and lacking experience. Some will clearly make mistakes, writes Bruce Bennett.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/12/21/RAND.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Beyond Rivalry and Camaraderie: Explaining Varying Asian Responses to China</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD279.html</id>
   <published>Mar 30, 2011</published>
   <updated>Mar 30, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Assesses the security and economic policy responses of a representative sample of Asian states to China between 1992 and 2008.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD279.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Book Review: &apos;Fallout&apos; by Catherine Collins and Douglas Frantz</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/01/09/LAT.html</id>
   <published>Jan 9, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 9, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Anyone concerned about nuclear proliferation or interested in the world of espionage will want to read Catherine Collins and Douglas Frantz&apos;s provocative new book, &quot;Fallout: The True Story of the CIA&apos;s Secret War on Nuclear Trafficking,&quot; which tells a fascinating story whose characters come straight out of a spy novel, writes Brian Michael Jenkins.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/01/09/LAT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Alternative to Futile Negotiations with N.K.</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/11/23/KH.html</id>
   <published>Nov 23, 2010</published>
   <updated>Nov 23, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Clearly, it&apos;s time for a new strategy, one that North Korea has been loathe to discuss: hasten Korean unification under South Korea&apos;s leadership, writes Bruce Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/11/23/KH.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Claims RAND Advocates War Against China Are False</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2010/11/22.html</id>
   <published>Nov 22, 2010</published>
   <updated>Nov 22, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Contrary to various online accounts, RAND is not advocating war against China, Korea, or any nation to advance recovery of the U.S. economy.  The notion that RAND has generated such an analysis is simply a rumor, with no foundation in fact.  We do not know how those who generated the rumor arrived at their conclusion.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2010/11/22.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Analyzing North Korea&apos;s Decision-Making Process on its Nuclear Weapons Programs with the Rational Choice and Cognitive Choice Models</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD268.html</id>
   <published>Aug 26, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 26, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Analyzes North Korea&apos;s Decision-making process regarding its nuclear programs with two choice models -- Rational Choice and Cognitive Choice -- and suggest effective/adaptive/robust deterrence strategy for the ROK-US combined forces.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD268.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Sinking of the Cheonan: Engage or Retaliate?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/06/30/GA.html</id>
   <published>Jun 30, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jun 30, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">North Korea&apos;s apparent sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan marks a new low in the North&apos;s provocative behavior. While some would prefer to respond with carrots rather than sticks, it is time to take action that imposes political costs on Kim Jong-il, writes Bruce Bennett.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/06/30/GA.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Uncertainties in the North Korean Nuclear Threat</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB589.html</id>
   <published>May 24, 2010</published>
   <updated>May 24, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">North Korea has denied the United States information about its nuclear weapon program, resulting in a high degree of uncertainty about the number and character of its nuclear weapons, how they might be used, and what impact they might have. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB589.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Cost Of Reuniting Korea</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/03/15/Forbes.html</id>
   <published>Mar 15, 2010</published>
   <updated>Mar 15, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">Prospects for reuniting South and North Korea may be better than at any time since the demise in 1994 of North Korea&apos;s &quot;Great Leader,&quot; Kim Il Sung. Several indicators suggest a possible move in this direction, writes Charles Wolf Jr.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/03/15/Forbes.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">    Managing Catastrophic North Korea Risks</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/01/21/KH.html</id>
   <published>Jan 21, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jan 21, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In recent years, U.S. commanders of the ROK/U.S. Combined Forces Command have been unanimous in stating that CFC could defeat a North Korean invasion. Nevertheless, they have also expressed concern about the catastrophic damage that North Korea could do to the ROK before losing, writes Bruce Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2010/01/21/KH.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Fall of the Wall: A World Restored?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/11/09/CNN.html</id>
   <published>Nov 9, 2009</published>
   <updated>Nov 9, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;When the Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago, those raised in the shadow of possible nuclear holocaust felt disbelief, followed by relief and hope that the end of the Cold War would bring lasting peace, and the end of conflict. And in Europe, at least, it mostly did &amp;ndash; but not everywhere, writes Christopher S. Chivvis.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/11/09/CNN.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">China&apos;s International Behavior: Activism, Opportunism, and Diversification</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG850.html</id>
   <published>Aug 27, 2009</published>
   <updated>Aug 27, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;China is a global actor of significant and growing importance, now integrated into the international system and altering that system&apos;s dynamics. The complexity of China&apos;s ever-changing global activism raises questions about its intentions and the implications for global stability and prosperity.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG850.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">How Russia Can and Can&apos;t Help Obama</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/08/26/FP.html</id>
   <published>Aug 26, 2009</published>
   <updated>Aug 26, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In hindsight, KGB analysts and Soviet officials were extraordinarily prescient about the perils of Islamist terrorism and the fallout from the Afghan jihad. But could Russia, for all its faults and foibles, be a more valuable counterterrorism partner today, asks Brian Michael Jenkins.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/08/26/FP.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Limited Options: Deterring North Korea and Iran</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/08/14/BAS.html</id>
   <published>Aug 14, 2009</published>
   <updated>Aug 14, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The question today is no longer whether the United States can still prevent North Korea and Iran from emerging as nuclear-armed regional adversaries, but instead, how to prevent them from being empowered by their nuclear weapons. This won&apos;t be easy, writes Lowell H. Schwartz.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/08/14/BAS.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">World Economic Recession Unlikely to Have Lasting Geopolitical Consequences</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP275.html</id>
   <published>Jul 30, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jul 30, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Will the current global economic recession have long-term geopolitical implications? Assuming that economic recovery begins in the first half of 2010, lasting structural alterations in the international system &amp;mdash; a substantial change in U.S.-China relations, for example &amp;mdash; are unlikely. This is because economic performance is only one of many geopolitical elements that shape countries&apos; strategic intent and core external policies.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP275.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Getting Value from the U.S.-ROK Summit</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/15/KH.html</id>
   <published>Jun 15, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jun 15, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;For months, N. Korea has been trying to upstage the summit between S. Korean President Lee and U.S. President Obama that is scheduled for June 16. Almost all Americans I know have heard of the recent N. Korean provocations. But few have heard anything about the U.S.-ROK summit, writes Bruce Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/15/KH.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">No Surprise in Failure to Deter North Korea</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/02/CT.html</id>
   <published>Jun 5, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jun 5, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;North Korea&apos;s latest misbehavior highlights an uncomfortable truth: the failure of the United States and the international community to deter its actions. In this case, it is pretty easy to see why North Korea has not been deterred, writes Bruce Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/06/02/CT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">N.K. Provocation Suggests Regime in Trouble</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/04/09/KH.html</id>
   <published>Apr 9, 2009</published>
   <updated>Apr 9, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;North Korea spent weeks preparing to launch a ballistic missile that could reach the United States. It argued that the launch was intended to put a satellite into orbit. But a space launch vehicle is a ballistic missile used for a modestly different purpose, writes Bruce W. Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2009/04/09/KH.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

