<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Pakistan</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/pakistan.xml"/>
     <updated>2013-05-17T15:35:47Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/pakistan.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2013, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/pakistan.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">After bin Laden: The United States, Afghanistan, and Pakistan</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2011/06/16/after-bin-laden.html</id>
   <published>Jun 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jun 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">On June 16, 2011, the RAND Corporation presented &quot;After bin Laden: The United States, Afghanistan, and Pakistan&quot; as part of its public outreach series in Santa Monica, California. The program featured senior political scientist Seth Jones, an expert on Afghanistan, Pakistan, and al Qa&apos;ida who has worked abroad in conflict zones over the last several years.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2011/06/16/after-bin-laden.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Brian Michael Jenkins Discusses the Death of bin Laden and Prognosis for al Qaeda</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2011/05/04/brian-jenkins-discusses-bin-laden.html</id>
   <published>May 4, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 4, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Brian Michael Jenkins, senior adviser at the RAND Corporation, spoke with RAND media relations director Jeffrey Hiday about the death of Osama bin Laden and how it might affect al Qaeda, the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan, and more.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2011/05/04/brian-jenkins-discusses-bin-laden.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New Strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan (Inside Story, Al Jazeera)</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2009/03/30/cheryl_benard_pakistan_afghanistan_strategy.html</id>
   <published>Mar 30, 2009</published>
   <updated>Mar 30, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">In an Al Jazeera Inside Story report, RAND expert Cheryl Benard and two other analysts provide insights into the Obama Administration&apos;s new strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan.
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2009/03/30/cheryl_benard_pakistan_afghanistan_strategy.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A New Diplomatic Mission for James Dobbins</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/blog/2013/05/for-rands-dobbins-a-new-diplomatic-mission.html</id>
   <published>May 7, 2013</published>
   <updated>May 7, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">President Obama named Ambassador James F. Dobbins, a veteran diplomat and the current director of the RAND International Security and Defense Policy Center, as his special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/blog/2013/05/for-rands-dobbins-a-new-diplomatic-mission.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Pakistan Elections: More Continuity Than Change</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/blog/2013/05/pakistan-elections-more-continuity-than-change.html</id>
   <published>May 8, 2013</published>
   <updated>May 8, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">This weekend&apos;s elections in Pakistan are more likely to yield continuity than change, an outcome that could offer some opportunities for enhanced engagement between Washington and Islamabad, a pair of RAND experts told reporters on April 6.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/blog/2013/05/pakistan-elections-more-continuity-than-change.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Pakistan&apos;s Role in the Kashmir Insurgency</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/09/01/JIR.html</id>
   <published>Sep 1, 2001</published>
   <updated>Sep 1, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2001/09/01/JIR.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Democracy is Best Weapon Against Terrorists in Pakistan</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/12/06/CST.html</id>
   <published>Dec 6, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 6, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">The increasingly unstable situation in Pakistan demonstrates that terrorism will continue to flourish until serious democratic reforms are undertaken there.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2003/12/06/CST.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Pakistan vs. al-Qaida</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2006/03/13/UPI.html</id>
   <published>Mar 13, 2006</published>
   <updated>Mar 13, 2006</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: Pakistan vs. al-Qaida, in United Press International.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2006/03/13/UPI.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Pakistan&apos;s Tribal Deals Aren&apos;t Working</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2006/12/28/IHT.html</id>
   <published>Dec 28, 2006</published>
   <updated>Dec 28, 2006</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: Pakistan&apos;s Tribal Deals Aren&apos;t Working, in International Herald Tribune.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2006/12/28/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Afghanistan&apos;s Local Insurgency</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/01/31/IHT.html</id>
   <published>Jan 31, 2007</published>
   <updated>Jan 31, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: Afghanistan&apos;s Local Insurgency, in International Herald Tribune.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/01/31/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Flagging Ally: Pakistan&apos;s Lapses Are Hurting the War on Terror</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/03/18/SDUT.html</id>
   <published>Mar 18, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 18, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">Published commentary by RAND staff: Flagging Ally: Pakistan&apos;s Lapses Are Hurting the War on Terror, in the San Diego Union-Tribune.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/03/18/SDUT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Long-Term Instability?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/12/31/WT.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2009</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The tragic assassination of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto casts a dark shadow across Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state with a long history of militarism and militancy and may auger a deeper and irreversible slide into Islamist violence, writes Christine Fair.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2007/12/31/WT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Not That Bad a Legacy, After All</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/01/17/IHT.html</id>
   <published>Jan 17, 2008</published>
   <updated>Jan 17, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;George W. Bush may leave a positive foreign policy legacy after all. A year ago this would have seemed difficult to credit... [Y]et over this period, Bush has put in place a series of more pragmatic policies from which even a Democratic successor will have a hard time moving away, writes James Dobbins.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/01/17/IHT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">To Support Democracy in Pakistan</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/02/24/WT.html</id>
   <published>Feb 24, 2008</published>
   <updated>Feb 24, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Pakistani people have seized an important democratic opportunity by voting decisively against retired general President Pervez Musharraf and the Islamist parties. The U.S. would be wise to support this action financially, diplomatically and politically, writes C. Christine Fair.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/02/24/WT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Why We Need to Nail Osama</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/02/27/WT.html</id>
   <published>Feb 27, 2008</published>
   <updated>Feb 27, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;[K]illing or capturing bin Laden remains a vital national and, indeed, international priority. Not only is it important &amp;mdash; it is worth devoting significant resources and making major tradeoffs to do so, writes Elbridge Colby.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/02/27/WT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Post-Musharraf Pakistan Policy</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/03/07/WP.html</id>
   <published>Mar 10, 2008</published>
   <updated>Mar 10, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The United States no longer can afford to blindly support Musharraf. Hence, America is moving toward defining a new policy direction for Pakistan, and for good reason, writes Farhana Ali.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/03/07/WP.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Danish Cartoons Doom Us All</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/03/21/UPI.html</id>
   <published>Mar 21, 2008</published>
   <updated>Mar 21, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Like two years ago, last week&apos;s rage in Pakistan over reprints of cartoons and a forthcoming Dutch film that insult Islam&apos;s holy book once again entangles Muslims and the West in a fury over freedom of speech, writes Farhana Ali.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/03/21/UPI.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">America is Making a Difference in Eastern Afghanistan</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/04/01/GM.html</id>
   <published>Apr 1, 2008</published>
   <updated>Apr 1, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;[The United States] has made some progress against the Taliban and other insurgent groups in eastern Afghanistan, and created a window of opportunity to spread this elsewhere, writes Seth G. Jones.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/04/01/GM.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Nuclear 9/11?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/09/11/CNN.html</id>
   <published>Sep 11, 2008</published>
   <updated>Sep 11, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">Will terrorists go nuclear? It is a question that worried public officials and frightened citizens have been asking for decades. It is no less of a worry today, as we ponder the seventh anniversary of 9/11, writes Brian Michael Jenkins.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/09/11/CNN.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Know Your Enemy: From Iraq to Afghanistan </title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/11/09/WT.html</id>
   <published>Nov 9, 2008</published>
   <updated>Nov 9, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;As debate continues about how to fight a resurgent Al Qaeda and Taliban in Afghanistan and along the Pakistan border, leaders in Washington, Kabul and Islamabad seem lost about what to do next.... And most experts agree that an Al Qaeda-orchestrated attack on the U.S. homeland would likely be plotted from their sanctuary in these border areas, write Benjamin Bahney and Renny McPherson.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2008/11/09/WT.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>
