2012-05-24T14:57:29Z Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation RAND Corporation http://www.rand.org/topics/probation.html http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR988.html Jan 24, 2012 Jan 24, 2012

The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funds programs that have been proven effective in curbing crime among juvenile probationers and young at-risk offenders. This report summarizes, for fiscal year 2009–2010, Corrections Standards Authority–mandated outcome measures from each of the programs, as well as county-determined supplemental outcomes.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR832.html Oct 5, 2010 Oct 5, 2010

The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funds programs that have been proven effective in curbing crime among juvenile probationers and young at-risk offenders. This report summarizes, for fiscal year 2008–2009, Corrections Standards Authority-mandated outcome measures from each of the programs, as well as county-determined supplemental outcomes.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR746.html Jan 12, 2010 Jan 12, 2010

<p>The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funds programs that have been proven effective in curbing crime among juvenile probationers and young at-risk offenders. This report summarizes outcome measures from each of the programs for fiscal year 2007-2008.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20080011.html Dec 31, 2007 Dec 31, 2007

<p>The focus of this essay is on alcohol use among probationers and parolees, but is also explores use of electronic monitoring technologies in other settings, and for other drugs.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20080419.html Dec 31, 2007 Dec 31, 2007

<p>Discusses a team approach to service delivery of an intensive probation program by the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP). Researchers interviewed juveniles who were randomly assigned to either the SOCP experimental condition or the control condition of a routine probation program. The intensive probation program, among other goals, focused on improving parent-child relationships and teaching youth how to choose better peers. At 1 year post random assignment, experimental and control youth were not significantly different on key family or peer relationship measures</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR498.html Jul 28, 2007 Jul 28, 2007

<p>Legislation for the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act identifies six specific outcomes to measure success of intervention programs for participating youths: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service. This annual report summarizes those outcomes for FY05-06.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR368-1.html Mar 31, 2007 Mar 31, 2007

<p>Legislation for the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act identifies six specific outcomes to measure success of intervention programs for participating youths: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service. This annual report summarizes those outcomes for FY04&ndash;05.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9130.html Nov 25, 2005 Nov 25, 2005

Over the past ten years, probation departments across the state of California have undertaken five major initiatives aimed at juvenile offenders and at-risk youths.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR291.html Aug 26, 2005 Aug 26, 2005

<p>Describes RAND&rsquo;s validation of the San Diego Risk and Resiliency Checkup (SDRRC), an assessment tool meant to objectively measure the risk and needs of the risk and needs of juvenile probationers in Los Angeles County. A youth&rsquo;s SDRRC &ldquo;resiliency score&rdquo; was found to be significantly related to 12-month recidivism rate. The Los Angeles Probation Department has implemented a policy to institutionalize the SDRRC, now referred to as the LARRC.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR297.html Aug 18, 2005 Aug 18, 2005

<p>Over the past ten years, California has undertaken five major initiatives aimed at juvenile offenders and at-risk youths. While juvenile arrests and teen pregnancies have dropped, these outcomes cannot be definitively attributed to the initiatives.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP168.html Dec 31, 2003 Dec 31, 2003

Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation/Parole (ISP) for Drug Offenders

http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20040920.html Dec 31, 2003 Dec 31, 2003

<p>Whereas strong efficacy research has been conducted on novel treatment approaches for adolescent substance abusers, little is known about the effectiveness of the substance abuse treatment approaches most commonly available to youths, their families, and referring agencies. This report compares the 12-month outcomes of adolescent probationers who received either Phoenix Academy, a therapeutic community for adolescents that uses a treatment model that is widely implemented across the U.S., or an alternative probation disposition.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20030015.html Dec 31, 2002 Dec 31, 2002

<p>Established in 1987, the program model, called Phoenix Academy, is a modified therapeutic community for adolescents that integrates an on-site public school into the treatment milieu. The model employs the view that substance abuse is the outward manifestation of a broad set of personal and developmental problems.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20020003.html Dec 31, 2001 Dec 31, 2001

<p>This chapter outlines the community justice model and applies it to one probation program.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP883.html Dec 31, 1999 Dec 31, 1999

The FARE Probation Experiment: Implementation and Outcomes of Day Fines for Felony Offenders in Maricopa County

http://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU1387.html Dec 31, 1995 Dec 31, 1995

This report presents the results of RAND's evaluation of a 1992 experimental drug testing and alternative invention program implemented in cooperation with the Maricopa County (Arizona) Adult Probation Department.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP472.html Dec 31, 1995 Dec 31, 1995

Drug court or probation? : an experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's drug court

http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP476.html Dec 31, 1995 Dec 31, 1995

Intensive supervision programs (ISP) have proliferated in the past decade. They generally emphasize reduced caseloads, close surveillance, urinalysis, treatment, and employment.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP355.html Dec 31, 1993 Dec 31, 1993

Maricopa County's drug court : an innovative program for first-time drug offenders on probation

http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N3186.html Dec 31, 1989 Dec 31, 1989

This Note presents the results of an evaluation of an ISP implemented by Marion County, Oregon, which documents a number of important lessons regarding implementing a prison-diversion ISP.