<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Verdicts</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/verdicts.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:58:03Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/verdicts.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/verdicts.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Type of Legal Representation Affects Outcomes in Murder Cases</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/2012/spring/news3.html</id>
   <published>May 11, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 11, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">An analysis of the outcomes for murder defendants who were represented either by public defenders or by appointed private counsel in Philadelphia raises important questions about the adequacy and fairness of
the criminal justice system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/2012/spring/news3.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the U.S. Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants&apos; privacy. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief provides an overview of a collection of essays, a collaborative project by the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy, examining the trade-offs between transparency and confidentiality in the civil justice system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New Book Explores Transparency in the American Civil Justice System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The quest for greater transparency in the American civil justice system is the topic of a new book of essays illustrating how a balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the civil justice system, raise public confidence and protect litigants&apos; privacy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Capping Non-Economic Awards in Medical Malpractice Trials: California Jury Verdicts Under MICRA</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG234.html</id>
   <published>Dec 17, 2004</published>
   <updated>Dec 17, 2004</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;A model for limits on trial awards and attorneys&amp;#8217; fees in medical malpractice cases is the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), a law enacted in California in 1975 in the hope of controlling soaring medical malpractice insurance premiums and ensuring the continuing availability of malpractice insurance.  MICRA caps awards for non-economic losses at $250,000 and limits plaintiffs&amp;#8217; attorney fees. The authors examine the effects these limits have on both plaintiffs&amp;#8217; awards and defendants&amp;#8217; liabilities.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG234.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Disputes Over Coverage of Emergency Department Services: A Study of Two Health Maintenance Organizations</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20040204.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The authors describe the characteristics and outcomes of enrollee-health plan disputes over insurance coverage for emergency department (ED) services at 2 large health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that apply the prudent layperson standard.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20040204.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Forty Years of Civil Jury Verdicts</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20040321.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Past studies on civil juries have been hampered by lack of data on verdicts spanning a sufficiently long period. Average jury awards tend to be highly variable from year to year, making it difficult to distinguish trends over relatively short periods of time. The authors use the longest time series of data on jury verdicts ever assembled: 40 years of data on tort cases in San Francisco County, CA and Cook County, IL collected by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20040321.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Goal Conflict in Juror Assessments of Compensatory and Punitive Damages</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP830.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1998</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">Recent tort reform debates have been hindered by a lack of knowledge of how jurors assess damages. Two studies investigated whether jurors are able to appropriately compartmentalize compensatory and punitive damages.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP830.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Punitive Damages in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR888.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1997</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1997</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report provides the technical details of an Institute for Civil Justice analysis of trends and patterns in punitive damage awards in financial injury cases in selected jurisdictions during the period 1985 through 1994.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR888.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Punitive Damages in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts: Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR889.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1997</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1997</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report is the executive summary of an Institute for Civil Justice analysis of trends and patterns in punitive damage awards in financial injury cases in selected jurisdictions during the period 1985 through 1994.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR889.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Punitive Damages and Financial Injury Jury Verdict</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT143.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1996</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1996</updated>
   <summary type="html">This publication contains the written statement of Stephen Carroll delivered on June 24, 1997, to the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT143.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Punitive Damage Awards in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9028.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1996</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1996</updated>
   <summary type="html">To provide an empirical basis for the ongoing debate about punitive damages, the authors drew on the ICJ&apos;s jury verdict database to conduct the first close analysis of trends and patterns in punitive awards for financial injuries.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9028.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the &quot;Deep-Pockets&quot; Hypothesis</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP607.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1996</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1996</updated>
   <summary type="html">Evidence that juries treat corporate defendants less favorably than individual defendants is often cited in support of the widely held view that juries are biased against wealthy &quot;deep-pocket&quot; defendants.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP607.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Trends in Civil Jury Verdicts Since 1985</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR694.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report describes all civil jury verdicts reached from 1985 to 1994 in the state courts of general jurisdiction in 15 jurisdictions across the nation and identifies trends in these verdicts.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR694.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Trends in Civil Jury Verdicts: New Data from 15 Jurisdictions</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9025.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">Makes an empirical contribution to the policy debate over tort reform.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9025.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Inside the Black Box: What Empirical Research Tells Us about Decisionmaking by Civil Juries</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP238.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1993</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1993</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article discusses the potential contribution to the policymaking process of systematic empirical research on the behavior of civil juries.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP238.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Is There a Deep-Pocket Bias in the Tort System? The Concern over Biases Against Deep-Pocket Defendants</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP130.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1992</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1992</updated>
   <summary type="html">There is a wide-spread perception that America&apos;s tort system is biased against so-called deep-pocket defendants. This paper summarizes what we know and don&apos;t know about deep-pocket biases.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP130.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Report Decision-Making Patterns Among Mandated Child Abuse Reporters</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N3225.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1989</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1989</updated>
   <summary type="html">The goal of this investigation was to examine whether reporting decisions could be described by a coherent process that was consistent across incidents of suspected abuse.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N3225.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2671.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1986</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1986</updated>
   <summary type="html">Advocates the use of systematic empirical research on civil jury behavior as an important tool in the policymaking process. The author discusses the methods that have been used for studying jury behavior,...</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2671.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Nicholas M. Pace</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/about/people/p/pace_nicholas_m.html</id>
   <published></published>
   <updated></updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;em&gt;Social Scientist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;J.D., University of Oregon; B.A. in political science, University of California, Santa Barbara</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/about/people/p/pace_nicholas_m.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

