We discuss how climate change will continue to affect wildfire risk; the uneven distribution of U.S. economic growth over the last four decades; the effectiveness of different approaches used to screen workers for COVID-19 symptoms; America's jihadists; how Chinese aggression could be advancing U.S. objectives; and what the future of warfare might look like.
Wildfires up and down the West Coast have burned more than five million acres, killing more than two dozen people and displacing tens of thousands more.
A recent RAND study zoomed in on two fire-prone areas in California to learn more about how climate change will continue to affect wildfire risk—and the potential consequences for insurance markets and homeowners. The authors project that, in one area, the Sierra Nevada foothills, the average number of acres burned each year could double by mid-century, and then double again by 2100, if more is not done to control greenhouse gas emissions. The researchers' findings could help policymakers, insurers, and homeowners better understand how to address growing risk.
What if income growth in America had stayed as equitable as it was in the three decades after World War II? RAND experts tackled this question in a new peer-reviewed working paper. They found that, if the more equitable income distributions had persisted, then the cumulative income of the bottom 90 percent of U.S. adults would have been $47 trillion higher by 2018. And in 2018 alone, the bottom 90 percent would have earned $2.5 trillion more—a 67 percent increase.
Many U.S. employers have questions about how to safely reopen while mitigating COVID-19 risks. But little is known about the effectiveness of screening for symptoms in the workplace. The authors of a new RAND paper determine that temperature checks are difficult to implement and problematic in terms of employee privacy. They also found little evidence that temperature checks are more effective than other screening approaches at detecting infection. However, checking workers' temperatures might help them feel safer.
Photos by Iraqi Ministry of Defence and Marina/Adobe Stock; design by Peter Soriano/RAND Corporation
Combating terrorism continues to be a focus for the U.S. government, and homegrown jihadists are a major concern. In a new report, RAND's Brian Michael Jenkins assesses this threat. Specifically, he examines hundreds of U.S. residents who have traveled abroad or attempted to do so to join or support terrorist organizations. Notably, it does not appear that radicalized individuals are being admitted into the United States or that immigration vetting is failing. Rather, America's jihadists are made in the United States.
The Trump administration's Indo-Pacific strategy has recently received a boost toward its goal of keeping the region “free and open” from Chinese coercion. And ironically, it's China who is responsible, says RAND's Derek Grossman. Beijing's increasing assertiveness against Hong Kong, Taiwan, and others has led many countries to support U.S. objectives. If this trend continues, then Beijing could further alienate others in the region.
RAND's Raphael Cohen recently led a study examining what the future of warfare might look like for the United States. In a new Q&A, he discusses the big takeaway: America faces a grand-strategic choice. The United States can double down on its role as a leading power; it can become more selective about committing its forces; or it can continue to keep up its ambitions without the capabilities to back them up. “You want to avoid that third option,” says Cohen.
Listen to the Recap
Get Weekly Updates from RAND
If you enjoyed this weekly recap, consider subscribing to Policy Currents, our newsletter and podcast.