Concentrated Poverty vs. Concentrated Affluence

Effects on Neighborhood Social Environments and Children’s Outcomes

Anne R. Pebley, Narayan Sastry

Published 2003

In this paper, we examine the effects of neighborhood poverty and affluence, other neighborhood characteristics, and family characteristics on two indicators of children’s development: reading-related and math-related achievement. Our analysis makes several important contributions to research in this area. First, we examine the degree of socioeconomic inequality in children’s achievement scores using a novel approach based on summary measures analogous to the Gini coefficient of income inequality. By calculating inequality in children’s achievement scores according to levels of neighborhood income, we can estimate the proportion of total inequality in children’s achievement test scores that are accounted for by neighborhood differences in income, before and after controlling for other child, family, and neighborhood characteristics. Furthermore, we can compare the inequality in children’s achievement test scores by neighborhood income to inequality in test scores according to family factors such as family earnings and mother’s education. Second, the analysis includes stronger controls for family-level effects, both by employing a richer set of family characteristics and by including a family-level random effect. Better controls for family-level effects allow us to draw clearer conclusions about the net effects of neighborhood conditions on children’s outcomes. Third, we investigate the role of neighborhood-level median income compared to indices of concentrated poverty and concentrated affluence. In other words, we examine whether the density of poor or affluent families is more or less important than the overall level of income in the neighborhood. Finally, the analysis investigates neighborhood effects in Los Angeles, based on data from the new Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (L.A.FANS-1). Los Angeles differs considerably, physically and socially, from urban areas such as Chicago, which have figured centrally in previous research on concentrated poverty neighborhoods. Our objective is to determine whether the same types of relationship observed elsewhere are also seen in a newer urban area such as Los Angeles.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2003
  • Pages: 29
  • Document Number: DRU-2400/10-LAFANS

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Pebley, Anne R. and Narayan Sastry, Concentrated Poverty vs. Concentrated Affluence: Effects on Neighborhood Social Environments and Children’s Outcomes, RAND Corporation, DRU-2400/10-LAFANS, 2003. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2400z10.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Pebley, Anne R. and Narayan Sastry, Concentrated Poverty vs. Concentrated Affluence: Effects on Neighborhood Social Environments and Children’s Outcomes. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2003. https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2400z10.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.