In community supervision settings, frequent alcohol testing with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations can reduce problem drinking and improve public health outcomes.

Efficacy of Frequent Monitoring with Swift, Certain, and Modest Sanctions for Violations

Insights from South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Project

Published in: American Journal of Public Health, v. 103, no. 1, Jan. 2013, p. e37-e43

Posted on RAND.org on December 06, 2012

by Beau Kilmer, Nancy Nicosia, Paul Heaton, Gregory Midgette

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Journal of Public Health

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. How did 24/7 affect public health in South Dakota?

OBJECTIVES: We examined the public health impact of South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project, an innovative program requiring individuals arrested for or convicted of alcohol-involved offenses to submit to breathalyzer tests twice per day or wear a continuous alcohol monitoring bracelet. Those testing positive are subject to swift, certain, and modest sanctions. METHODS: We conducted differences-in-differences analyses comparing changes in arrests for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI), arrests for domestic violence, and traffic crashes in counties with the program to counties without the program. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, more than 17 000 residents of South Dakota—including more than 10% of men aged 18 to 40 years in some counties—had participated in the 24/7 program. At the county level, we documented a 12% reduction in repeat DUI arrests (P = .023) and a 9% reduction in domestic violence arrests (P = .035) following adoption of the program. Evidence for traffic crashes was mixed. CONCLUSIONS: In community supervision settings, frequent alcohol testing with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations can reduce problem drinking and improve public health outcomes.

Key Findings

  • Between 2005 and 2010, more than 17,000 residents of South Dakota—including more than 10 percent of men aged 18 to 40 years in some counties—participated in the 24/7 program.
  • At the county level, researchers documented a 12 percent reduction in repeat DUI arrests and a 9 percent reduction in domestic violence arrests following adoption of the program. Evidence for traffic crashes was mixed.

Recommendations

  • Evaluations are needed to explore whether 24/7 can work outside South Dakota in both rural and urban areas.
  • It will also be useful to explore how testing programs with swift and certain sanctions can best incorporate positive incentives for compliance as well as treatment services.
Access further information on this document at American Journal of Public Health

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.