Improving the Quality of DoD's Civilian Workforce: Guidance for the Office of the Chancellor for Education and Professional Development
Jan 1, 2002
|PDF file||8.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback182 pages||$24.00||$19.20 20% Web Discount|
Examines several approaches to strategic planning for the DoD Office of the Chancellor for Education and Professional Development, which was established in 1998 as the principal advocate for the academic quality and cost-effectiveness of education and professional development for DoD civilians.
A Framework for Strategic Planning Analysis
Trends Affecting DoD Civilian Education, Training, and Development
Key Challenges in DoD Civilian Education and Workforce Planning
Identifying and Investigating Best-Practice Organizations
"Golden Nuggets" for the Chancellor's Office
Case Studies from the Literature
Case Studies from Site Visits
The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND's National Security Research Division.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.