News Release
Addressing Sprawl Issues and Protecting Biodiversity Can Benefit Military Bases, RAND Study Finds
Jun 28, 2007
An Assessment of DoD's Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative to Buffer Installation Encroachment
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 5.5 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback254 pages | $44.00 | $35.20 20% Web Discount |
Over the past few decades, military installations have experienced diminishing open space near their borders from suburban sprawl and other developments. Such encroachment pressures limit the ability to conduct mission-essential testing and training. Such development can also destroy or displace native plant and animal species, the result being that military installations become islands of refuge for threatened and endangered species, which can also restrict an installation’s operations. In 2003, DoD created the Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) to help address such encroachment pressures. The REPI program helps installations implement compatible land use partnering projects with state and local governments and non-governmental organizations to protect non-military land, which helps relieve installation encroachment pressures. In this monograph, RAND researchers assessed the effectiveness of the REPI projects. The authors also identify the main causes of encroachment; detail the benefits, both to the military and local communities, of buffering areas near installations with REPI projects; and provide recommendations for how to improve REPI’s effectiveness.
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Understanding the Encroachment Threat
Chapter Three
How Encroachment Is Being Addressed
Chapter Four
Methodology and Criteria for Assessing the Accomplishments of the Buffering Activities
Chapter Five
Assessing Accomplishments Across All the Buffering Projects
Chapter Six
Findings
Chapter Seven
Recommendations to Improve Military Conservation Buffering
Appendix A
The Importance of Biodiversity
Appendix B
An Assessment of Eglin AFB’s Buffering Activities
Appendix C
An Assessment of Fort Carson’s Buffering Activities
Appendix D
An Assessment of Fort Stewart’s Buffering Activities
Appendix E
An Assessment of MCAS Beaufort’s Buffering Activities
Appendix F
An Assessment of NAS Fallon’s Buffering Activities
Appendix G
An Assessment of NAS Whiting Field’s Buffering Activities
Appendix H
Background Information on Selected Buffering Projects
Appendix I
The Land Price Trend Analysis
The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.