Creating Unique Health ID Numbers Would Facilitate Improved Health Care Quality and Efficiency
Oct 20, 2008
An Examination of the Costs and Benefits of a Unique Patient Identifier for the U.S. Health Care System
|PDF file||0.6 MB|
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
A national health information network, or NHIN, that enables disparate health care information systems across the United States to allow authorized users to easily and quickly share critical health information has the potential to enhance safety and dramatically improve the quality and efficiency of the national health care system. A unique patient identifier (UPI) to use as a singular key to accurately link, file, and retrieve individual health records was seen as an important element of the national system and was mandated as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) legislation. However, privacy and security concerns about electronically sharing patient information have completely sidetracked the development of standards for a UPI and threaten to delay the development of the NHIN.
Correctly linking patients to their health data is a vital step in achieving quality health care. The two primary approaches to this linking are the UPI and statistical matching based on multiple personal attributes, such as name, address, and Social Security number (SSN). Lacking a UPI, most of the U.S. health care system uses statistical matching methods. There are important health, efficiency, security, and safety reasons for moving the country away from the inherent uncertainties of statistical approaches and toward a UPI for health care.
This monograph examines the operational advantages and disadvantages, compares the errors, examines the costs, and discusses the privacy issues associated with the UPI and its alternatives. Our analysis indicates that a health care system in which every patient has a unique, nondisclosing (i.e., containing no personal information) patient identifier is clearly desirable for reducing errors, simplifying interoperability, increasing efficiency, improving patient confidence, promoting NHIN architectural flexibility, and protecting patient privacy. A one-time cost of $1.5 to $11.1 billion for a UPI, to remove the systemic errors in health-records retrieval, is small by comparison with the value a potential efficiency savings of $77 billion per year at the 90-percent level of adoption (with additional safety and health values that could double these benefits) that previous studies estimated for connected Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. Prohibiting development of a UPI actually sidesteps the larger problem: the development of a NHIN without first establishing a legal environment that best protects privacy while also encouraging the advances that interoperability of EMR systems between providers would bring to health care quality and efficiency. Continuing de facto endorsement of statistical matching as the only practicable approach to linking patients to their electronic health records will inhibit the effective development of the national health information network.
This monograph should be of interest to health care IT professionals, other health care executives and researchers, and officials in the government responsible for health policy.
The Primary Approaches for Identifying Patients and Linking Their Health Records
Errors in Linking to Medical Records
Privacy and Security of the Alternatives
The Policy and Political Environment for a National Patient Identifier
Conclusions and Implications
Analysis of False-Positive Errors in a Large Demographic Database
Designs and Costs of Systems for Accessing Personal Health Information
The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Health, a unit of the RAND Corporation, and sponsored by a consortium of health information technology companies: Cerner Corporation, CPSI, Intel, IBM, Microsoft, MISYS, Oracle, and Siemens.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.