Cover: The Principal Economic Consideration in Making National Security Policy.

The Principal Economic Consideration in Making National Security Policy.

Published 1964

by Robert A. Levine

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback7 pages $20.00

A discussion, addressed to political scientists, of only one of the economic considerations suggested by the title --the supply of funds for national security. The classical economic model provides that any increase in one segment of the economy (defense funds, for instance) requires compensatory decrease in another or an increase in taxes. The Keynesian model provides that in a period of unemployment no such compensation is needed. The Keynesian model is closer to reality, but enough individuals in power support the classical model that this compensatory decrease does occur. The paper poses a series of questions such as "How possible might it be to move toward the...Keynesian model through political education and/or pressure?" Answers require the techniques of the social scientist.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.