The Economics of Group Practice.

Joseph P. Newhouse

ResearchPublished 1971

Group medical practice is often urged, to lower health care costs and improve quality; but the claimed advantages do not apply to fee-for-service, single-specialty physician groups that share costs without prepayment plans. In a sample of 20 such groups and solo practitioners, the groups spent more for rent, and their salary costs for nonmedical services such as appointments, records, and billing averaged $2.55 more per patient visit. Hospital outpatient clinics are still less efficient, judging from three with and without teaching functions. Clinic overhead costs per visit (excluding rent) averaged $14.24, compared with $4.54 for private doctors. The economic theory of groups predicts just such lack of motivation to improve efficiency and control costs when the physician does not bear the financial effects. Revenue-sharing doctors also saw fewer patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. It does suggest that encouraging formation of more groups might decrease the supply of medical services while increasing costs. 27 pp. Bibliog.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
27 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1971
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 27
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4478/2

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Newhouse, Joseph P., The Economics of Group Practice. RAND Corporation, P-4478/2, 1971. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4478z2.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Newhouse, Joseph P., The Economics of Group Practice. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4478z2.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.