Information Operations

The Imperative of Doctrine Harmonization and Measures of Effectiveness

Arturo Munoz, Erin Dick

Expert InsightsPublished Aug 28, 2015

In an update to a 2012 RAND report on information operations (IO) in Afghanistan, this Perspective describes the continuing challenges of IO doctrine integration and harmonization and the establishment of measures of effectiveness for IO within the Department of Defense. Despite recommendations made in the 2012 report, little progress has been made in these areas, which will have an even greater negative impact as the United States reduces the number of troops in theater and as resources to combat the enemy's propaganda offense remain limited.

Key Finding

While there have been some tactical IO successes in Afghanistan, little progress has been made in the area of doctrine integration and harmonization and the establishment of measures of effectiveness in the five years since the previous study period ended (2010).

  • This deficiency will have an even greater negative impact as the United States continues to reduce the number of troops in theater and as resources to combat the enemy's propaganda offence remain limited.

Recommendation

  • The Department of Defense should implement the recommendations made in RAND's 2012 report, U.S. Military Information Operations in Afghanistan: Effectiveness of Psychological Operations 2001–2010, especially those regarding integration and harmonization of IO doctrine and the establishment of measures of effectiveness for IO.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2015
  • Pages: 4
  • Document Number: PE-128-OSD

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Munoz, Arturo and Erin Dick, Information Operations: The Imperative of Doctrine Harmonization and Measures of Effectiveness, RAND Corporation, PE-128-OSD, August 2015. As of September 19, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE128.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Munoz, Arturo and Erin Dick, Information Operations: The Imperative of Doctrine Harmonization and Measures of Effectiveness. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE128.html.
BibTeX RIS

This research was conducted within the Intelligence Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.