">

Competing with Russia Militarily

Implications of Conventional and Nuclear Conflicts

Clint Reach, Edward Geist, Abby Doll, Joe Cheravitch

Expert InsightsPublished Jun 22, 2021

The U.S. Department of Defense now recognizes Russia as one of its "principal priorities" in the context of renewed great power competition. In this Perspective, the authors examine the implications of a conventional military confrontation between NATO and Russia in Europe and the associated risk of nuclear escalation.

This Perspective primarily draws on published RAND Corporation reports to identify strengths, weaknesses, and risks for both the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Russia in a large-scale war. The authors found that although Russia does possess a number of key advantages in the early stages of a war that would pose serious challenges to a NATO response, its current ground force structure and posture do not ensure an obvious path to defeating NATO in a protracted conflict and avoiding nuclear escalation. The authors also find that by addressing existing challenges posed by Russia in the Baltic theater, there are opportunities for NATO to strengthen deterrence and shape Russian perceptions of NATO's ability to respond militarily in advance of a possible crisis scenario.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Reach, Clint, Edward Geist, Abby Doll, and Joe Cheravitch, Competing with Russia Militarily: Implications of Conventional and Nuclear Conflicts, RAND Corporation, PE-330-A, June 2021. As of October 10, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE330.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Reach, Clint, Edward Geist, Abby Doll, and Joe Cheravitch, Competing with Russia Militarily: Implications of Conventional and Nuclear Conflicts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2021. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE330.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army and conducted by the Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program within the RAND Arroyo Center.

This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.