Cover: Mathematical Analysis of Traffic Detection Systems Using Unreliable Sensors.

Mathematical Analysis of Traffic Detection Systems Using Unreliable Sensors.

by Anthony P. Ciervo

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback53 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

An initial attempt to deal with a new class of applied mathematical problems: how to extract information optimally from emplaced fields of sensors. These problems are relevant to interdiction and border security. The basic sensor model assumes that each sensor is subject to both false alarms and detection failures. The analytical assumptions contained in this statistical model represent a compromise between the opposing demands of realism and mathematical tractability. Methods are presented for determining the properties of traffic flow that can be derived from the data produced by one such unreliable sensor, and by two or more of them. A method is given for formulating a suboptimal strategy for deploying a fixed number of perfectly reliable sensors to monitor a territorial border. An understanding of probability theory is assumed; detailed derivations are included as appendixes. 53 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.