Cover: Making Evaluation Effective: A Guide.

Making Evaluation Effective: A Guide.

Published 1971

by Robert A. Levine, Albert P. Williams

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback48 pages $20.00

Text of an evaluation manual prepared for the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Evaluation and Monitoring of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to aid in building an effective evaluation structure for government programs and projects throughout the agencies of HEW. This guide is intended to assist evaluators in the development of a strategy--in determining when to evaluate, who should evaluate, and how to supervise the evaluation; how to allocate efforts among different types of evaluation; and how to assess evaluation. As per the HEW request, the guide avoids questions of methodology and concentrates instead on the decisionmaking context for evaluation. Suggested documentation includes an annual evaluation plan and statement of strategic objectives to be prepared by each evaluation office, a statement of rationale of each evaluation to be prepared by the initiating office, and critical program summary to be prepared by chief evaluation officers. 48 pp.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.