Cover: Radar and Communication Antenna Siting for Low-Angle Radiation at High Frequencies.

Radar and Communication Antenna Siting for Low-Angle Radiation at High Frequencies.

Published 1972

by Henry G. Booker, Cullen M. Crain

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback40 pages $20.00

It is sometimes assumed that to obtain good low-angle radio transmission and reception at high frequencies one must use vertical polarization and have an extensive, horizontal, highly conductive foreground, such as an ocean surface. In the absence of such a surface, use may be made of inland sites having a sloping foreground, combined with distant level terrain. The theory presented here suggests that the angle of slope of inland sites should be four times the minimum angle of elevation for which coverage is required, so that coverage down to 1 degree requires a slope of 1 in 14. With the "pseudo-Brewster" angle of elevation for sea water as the cutoff angle for which the site is designed, horizontal polarization may be used at an inland site to obtain coverage down to the same angle obtained for vertical polarization over sea water with the antenna at the water's edge. 40 pp. Ref. (Author)

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.