Alternative Adjudication
An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program
ResearchPublished 1988
In 1985, New Jersey implemented a statewide program of mandatory court-administered arbitration of automobile injury lawsuits. In order to evaluate the program, the Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) examined court records for a random sample of more than 1,000 auto negligence cases filed in either 1983 (pre-arbitration) or 1985 (post-arbitration), and surveyed approximately 300 litigants and 400 attorneys. No significant changes in trial rates or litigation costs were found. However, the program has had some unanticipated effects. Cases that are assigned to the program are significantly less likely to settle privately without a third-party hearing and, on average, take significantly longer to terminate than in the pre-arbitration period. Both litigants and attorneys evaluate arbitration hearings quite favorably. It appears that the program is providing disputants greater access to third-party hearings, but not greater efficiency.
Related Content
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1988
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 153
- Paperback Price: $30.00
- Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-0925-8
- Document Number: R-3676-ICJ
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
MacCoun, Robert J., Edgar Lind, Deborah R. Hensler, David L. Bryant, and Patricia A. Ebener, Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program, RAND Corporation, R-3676-ICJ, 1988. As of September 16, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3676.html
MacCoun, Robert J., Edgar Lind, Deborah R. Hensler, David L. Bryant, and Patricia A. Ebener, Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1988. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3676.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.