Cover: Does Obesity Contribute as Much to Morbidity as Poverty or Smoking?

Does Obesity Contribute as Much to Morbidity as Poverty or Smoking?

Published 2001

by Roland Sturm, Kenneth B. Wells

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Objectives: The prevalence of obesity is increasing in America, but its impact on morbidity relative to other health risks is unclear. This paper compares the effects of overweight, poverty, smoking, and problem drinking on occurrence of chronic conditions and health-related quality-of-life. Methods: Nationally representative household telephone survey of 9585 adults fielded in 1998, using self-reported measures of height and weight (body mass index, BMI), poverty (below federal poverty level), smoking status, recent problem drinking, major chronic conditions, and health-related quality-of-life by SF-12 global scales. Regression analyses were used to estimate effects of health risk factors on morbidity. Results: 36% of adults are overweight but not obese (25<=BMI<30) and another 23% are obese (BMI>=30). Controlling for demographics, obesity is associated with more chronic conditions and worse physical health-related quality of life (p's <.01). While lifetime smoking history and poverty also significantly predict having chronic conditions, their effect sizes are significantly smaller. Even after controlling for chronic conditions, obesity predicts physical health-related quality of life, in that case with an effect size similar to poverty for both men and women and similar to smoking for men and larger than smoking for women. The effect of problem drinking is always smaller. Conclusions: Obesity is highly prevalent and associated with at least as much morbidity in terms of chronic medical conditions and reduction in physical health-related quality-of-life as are poverty, smoking, and problem drinking. Nevertheless, the latter have achieved more consistent attention in recent decades in clinical practice and public health policy.

Originally published in: Public Health, v. 115, 2001, pp. 229-235.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.