Cover: Systematic Reviews for Occupational Safety and Health Questions

Systematic Reviews for Occupational Safety and Health Questions

Resources for Evidence Synthesis

Published Jul 11, 2016

by Susanne Hempel, Lea Xenakis, Marjorie Danz

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Question

  1. What evidence synthesis resources exist to facilitate conducting systematic reviews for occupational safety and health questions?

This report introduces systematic reviews of the literature as a research methodology to summarize the existing evidence with a transparent, reliable, and valid approach. It covers the systematic review steps: (1) define the question, (2) create a protocol, (3) conduct a literature search and screen for inclusion, (4) document and assess included studies, and (5) evaluate and interpret the body of evidence. The report also provides resources for drawing conclusions and developing recommendations based on the systematic review. We performed a literature review and consulted with producers and consumers of systematic reviews over the course of the project to identify available resources. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) staff provided a draft systematic review framework and continuous input to ensure relevance and applicability to occupational safety and health questions. The report draws on key general existing guidance for systematic reviews as well as identified resources specific to occupational safety and health evidence synthesis. Occupational safety and health is an extensive multidisciplinary field and encompasses a broad spectrum of issues that affect the health and safety of individuals in the workplace. Standard systematic review tools and methods may need to be adapted to fit the unique requirements of evidence synthesis for occupational safety and health questions. The report provides practical guidance to execute a systematic review as well as considerations specific to evidence synthesis for occupational safety and health questions.

Key Findings

  • A large number of resources exist to conduct systematic reviews. This report provides references and online links to pertinent evidence synthesis resources, organized by key systematic review steps. The resources support systematic reviews as a research methodology to summarize the existing evidence with a transparent, reliable, and valid approach.
  • Guidance specific to systematic reviews for occupational safety and health questions is still fragmented. Occupational safety and health encompasses a broad spectrum of issues that affect the health and safety of individuals in the workplace. Systematic reviews in occupational safety and health may draw on resources from a variety of disciplines, in particular health care, and adapt tools and methods to fit the unique requirements of evidence synthesis in occupational safety and health.

Recommendations

  • Systematic reviews in occupational safety and health should follow the general steps of a systematic review: (1) define the question, (2) create a protocol, (3) conduct a literature search and screen for inclusion, (4) document and assess included studies, and (5) evaluate and interpret the body of evidence. Standard systematic review tools and methods may need to be adapted to fit the unique requirements of evidence synthesis for occupational safety and health questions.
  • Systematic review is an evolving research methodology, and guidance needs to be reviewed periodically as methodological practices are refined and new pertinent strategies are identified to improve evidence synthesis for occupational safety and health questions.

The research reported here was prepared for the commissioned by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and conducted by the Infrastructure Resilience and Environmental Policy Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This report is part of the RAND research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.