The report seeks to identify barriers that companies face when attempting to enter into contracts with the Department of Defense (DoD), especially when they are not traditional DoD suppliers. To learn more about barriers, the authors interviewed personnel in companies that are in industries of likely interest to DoD and interviewed DoD personnel who work with suppliers.

Identifying and Eliminating Barriers Faced by Nontraditional Department of Defense Suppliers

Amy G. Cox, Nancy Young Moore, Clifford A. Grammich

ResearchPublished Sep 25, 2014

The report seeks to identify barriers that companies face when attempting to enter into contracts with the Department of Defense (DoD), especially when they are not traditional DoD suppliers. To learn more about barriers, the authors interviewed personnel in companies that are in industries of likely interest to DoD and interviewed DoD personnel who work with suppliers. The interviews revealed some shared experiences that reportedly made some suppliers less willing to bid on DoD contracts: lack of access to and communication from DoD; DoD's complex and inefficient bid and selection process; the extra work and delays entailed in DoD's administration and management of contracts; and the lengthy funding time line and delays in final payments. DoD personnel interviewed had different perceptions, although they did confirm the existence of some barriers.

Key Findings

One Prevalent Barrier Is the Department of Defense's (DoD's) Cumbersome Bid and Selection Processes

  • These processes often require that bidders employ specialized units or employees.

Another Barrier Is DoD's Limited Communication with Potential or Actual Bidders

  • Access points within DoD are lacking, and bidders reportedly have difficulty getting answers to questions about design specifications.

A Third Barrier Is Contract Administration and Management That Created Extra Work and Delays

  • Delays in final payments often caused particular hardship for small businesses.

A Fourth Barrier Is a Lengthy Funding Time Line and Final Payments That Often Also Involved Delays and Gaps

  • The extensive time between initial bid and initial funding can be difficult to bridge, especially for small businesses with little capital that have to cover employees' time.

Recommendations

In the short term:

  • DoD and suppliers should work to improve communication between them.
  • Bidding processes should be streamlined.
  • A list of prequalified suppliers should be maintained to reduce delays during the bidding process.

In the longer term:

  • Some effort should be directed at simplifying and speeding the final payment processes.
  • Backlogs should be reduced at the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the Defense Contract Management Agency.
  • Best commercial procurement practices should be adopted.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
72 pages
List Price
$24.95
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2014
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 72
  • Paperback Price: $24.95
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-8044-8
  • Document Number: RR-267-OSD

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Cox, Amy G., Nancy Young Moore, and Clifford A. Grammich, Identifying and Eliminating Barriers Faced by Nontraditional Department of Defense Suppliers, RAND Corporation, RR-267-OSD, 2014. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR267.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Cox, Amy G., Nancy Young Moore, and Clifford A. Grammich, Identifying and Eliminating Barriers Faced by Nontraditional Department of Defense Suppliers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR267.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the DoD Office of Small Business Programs and conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.