Mental Health Retrosight

Understanding the returns from research (lessons from schizophrenia): Policy Report

Steven Wooding, Alexandra Pollitt, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Gavin Cochrane, Stephanie Diepeveen, Susan Guthrie, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Vincent Larivière, Molly Morgan Jones, Siobhan Ni Chonaill, et al.

ResearchPublished Oct 28, 2013

Cover: Mental Health Retrosight
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes Summary Only; other ebook formats

This study examines the impacts arising from neuroscience and mental health research going back 20-25 years, and identifies attributes of the research, researchers or research setting that are associated with translation into patient benefit, in the particular case of schizophrenia.

The study combined two methods: forward-tracing case studies to examine where scientific advances of 20 years ago have led to impact today; and backward-tracing perspectives to identify the research antecedents of today's interventions in schizophrenia. These research and impact trails are followed principally in Canada, the UK and the USA. The headline findings are as follows:

  1. The case studies and perspectives support the view that mental health research has led to a diverse and beneficial range of academic, health, social and economic impacts over the 20 years since the research was undertaken.
  2. Clinical research has had a larger impact on patient care than basic research has over the 20 years since the research was undertaken.
  3. Those involved in mental health research who work across boundaries are associated with wider health and social benefits.
  4. Committed individuals, motivated by patient need, who effectively champion research agendas and/or translation into practice are key in driving the development and implementation of interventions.

This report provides an overview of the methods and presents the full set of findings, with the policy provocations they raise, and an emerging research agenda. It has been written for funders of biomedical and health research and health services, health researchers, and policymakers in those fields. It will also be of interest to those involved in research and impact evaluation.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Wooding, Steven, Alexandra Pollitt, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Gavin Cochrane, Stephanie Diepeveen, Susan Guthrie, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Vincent Larivière, Molly Morgan Jones, Siobhan Ni Chonaill, Claire O'Brien, Stuart S. Olmsted, Dana Schultz, Eleanor Winpenny, Harold Alan Pincus, and Jonathan Grant, Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the returns from research (lessons from schizophrenia): Policy Report, RAND Corporation, RR-325-GBF, 2013. As of September 17, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR325.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Wooding, Steven, Alexandra Pollitt, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Gavin Cochrane, Stephanie Diepeveen, Susan Guthrie, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Vincent Larivière, Molly Morgan Jones, Siobhan Ni Chonaill, Claire O'Brien, Stuart S. Olmsted, Dana Schultz, Eleanor Winpenny, Harold Alan Pincus, and Jonathan Grant, Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the returns from research (lessons from schizophrenia): Policy Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2013. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR325.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The project described in this report was supported in Canada by the Graham Boeckh Foundation, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; in the UK by the National Institute for Health Research; and in the USA by the National Institute of Mental Health. The research was conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.