Care Transitions to and from the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE) for Service Members with Traumatic Brain Injury

Lynsay Ayer, Coreen Farris, Carrie M. Farmer, Lily Geyer, Dionne Barnes-Proby, Gery W. Ryan, Lauren Skrabala, Deborah M. Scharf

ResearchPublished May 7, 2015

Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have been one of the leading causes of death and injury among U.S. troops. Those who survive an IED blast or other injuries may be left with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and attendant or co-occurring psychological symptoms. In response to the need for specialized services for these populations, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) established the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE) in Bethesda, Maryland, in 2010. The NICoE's success in fulfilling its mission is impacted by its relationships with home station providers, patients, and their families. The RAND Corporation was asked to evaluate these relationships and provide recommendations for strengthening the NICoE's efforts to communicate with these groups to improve patients' TBI care. Through surveys, site visits, and interviews with NICoE staff, home station providers, service members who have received care at the NICoE, and the families of these patients, RAND's evaluation examined the interactions between the NICoE and the providers responsible for referring patients and implementing treatment plans.

Key Takeaways

Communication between home stations and the NICoE is insufficient

  • Better communication about patients would improve coordination of patient care and ease transitions to and from the NICoE.

Understanding of the NICoE's mission, eligibility criteria, and services varies across the Military Health System

  • Better messaging about the purpose and function of the NICoE would improve coordination of patient care.

The NICoE is seen to mitigate barriers service members face in seeking treatment for TBI or psychological health problems

  • Barriers include resource constraints, stigma, and provider turnover at home station facilities.

Home station providers had a favorable impression of NICoE services but noted concerns

  • Some didn't see a big difference in types of services; others saw problems with the NICoE's attitude toward home station care and creation of unrealistic expectations in patients returning to home station care.

The NICoE patient discharge planning process requires collaboration between NICoE and home station personnel, the patient, and the family

  • Some former NICoE patients encounter challenges in this transition.
  • It appears that little information is returned to the NICoE about what recommendations. are or are not implemented by home station providers.
  • Patient satisfaction with home station care is varied.

Recommendations

  • Clearly define and communicate the clinical, research, and educational roles of the NICoE within the Military Health System.
  • Foster a collaborative culture between the NICoE and home station providers
  • Inform home station providers about the NICoE's eligibility criteria.
  • Focus patient recruitment on service members in greatest need.
  • Evaluate the effects of NICoE assessment and treatment services on patient outcomes.
  • Increase and formalize communication and coordination between the NICoE and home station providers.
  • Streamline discharge summaries and provide recommendations in the context of the treatment already delivered by the home station.
  • Ensure that service members can access recommended care at or near their home station and are aware of its cost.
  • Enhance patient tracking and follow-up after discharge.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Ayer, Lynsay, Coreen Farris, Carrie M. Farmer, Lily Geyer, Dionne Barnes-Proby, Gery W. Ryan, Lauren Skrabala, and Deborah M. Scharf, Care Transitions to and from the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE) for Service Members with Traumatic Brain Injury. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR653.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.