Active Component Responsibility in Reserve Component Pre- and Postmobilization Training

Ellen M. Pint, Matthew W. Lewis, Thomas F. Lippiatt, Philip Hall-Partyka, Jonathan P. Wong, Tony Puharic

ResearchPublished Apr 29, 2015

In response to readiness problems in Army reserve component (RC) units mobilized for Operation Desert Storm in 1990 and 1991, Congress passed legislation establishing requirements for RC personnel and training and active component support to RC units. Since then, Army policies and organizations supporting RC training have evolved to meet rotational demands for forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they continue to evolve as these operations come to an end and defense budgets decline. This report examines the congressional intent underlying existing law, the Army's recent experience preparing RC units for deployments, and its future plans for RC training requirements and training support. It recommends changes to law and policy needed to support future RC training plans. This research suggests that premobilization training should focus on individual soldier qualifications and collective training at the crew, squad, and platoon levels, particularly for combat units. In addition, the Army should maintain a multicomponent RC training support structure to ensure that training standards do not diverge across components. Furthermore, some provisions of existing legislation no longer reflect the current operating environment, although others remain relevant.

Key Findings

The Provisions of Title XI Were Intended to Address Readiness Problems in Reserve Component (RC) Units Mobilized for Operation Desert Storm

  • Title XI assigned active component advisers to RC units to increase the quantity and quality of full-time support.
  • Title XI established a program to minimize postmobilization training time by focusing premobilization training on individual soldier qualifications and crew-, squad-, and platoon-level training.

Army RC Training Support Organizations Evolved to Support the Rotational Demand for Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan

  • By 2001, the Army had consolidated active component advisers into multicomponent training support organizations known as First and Fifth Army.
  • After 2007, when RC mobilizations were limited to one year, First Army shifted its focus to postmobilization training, and the Army National Guard and Army Reserve increased premobilization training support.
  • Premobilization training focused on soldier readiness processing and individual soldier qualifications; most collective training occurred immediately before mobilization or after mobilization.

The Army's Future Training Plans Suggest That RC Units Will Focus on Collective Training During the Train/Ready Phase of the Army Force Generation Cycle

  • Given past experience, company-level live fire and maneuver proficiency will be difficult for combat units to achieve in premobilization training.
  • If individual soldier qualifications and training requirements are not met prior to mobilization, these tasks will have to be completed after mobilization, affecting the training support resources that will be needed.

Recommendations

  • Given experience from both the 1990s and more-recent operations, premobilization training should focus on individual soldier qualifications and collective training at the crew, squad, and platoon levels, particularly for combat units.
  • The Army should maintain a multicomponent RC training support structure to ensure that training standards do not diverge across components.
  • While some provisions of Title XI remain relevant, others no longer reflect the current operating environment and should be changed.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
132 pages
List Price
$27.50
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2015
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 132
  • Paperback Price: $27.50
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-8783-6
  • Document Number: RR-738-A

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Pint, Ellen M., Matthew W. Lewis, Thomas F. Lippiatt, Philip Hall-Partyka, Jonathan P. Wong, and Tony Puharic, Active Component Responsibility in Reserve Component Pre- and Postmobilization Training, RAND Corporation, RR-738-A, 2015. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR738.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Pint, Ellen M., Matthew W. Lewis, Thomas F. Lippiatt, Philip Hall-Partyka, Jonathan P. Wong, and Tony Puharic, Active Component Responsibility in Reserve Component Pre- and Postmobilization Training. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR738.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the Director of Training in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, and conducted by the Manpower and Training Program within the RAND Arroyo Center.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.