Read Online

The Federal Voting Assistance Program and the Road Ahead

Achieving Institutional Change Through Analysis and Collaboration

by Victoria A. Greenfield, Shoshana R. Shelton, Edward Balkovich, John S. Davis II, David M. Adamson

Download

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback228 pages $34.50 $27.60 20% Web Discount

Research Questions

  1. How does the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP), which is charged with administering the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) of 1986, serve UOVACA voters?
  2. What is FVAP's role in the context of a larger voting assistance system, and how can it play that role more effectively?
  3. How can FVAP build on recent organizational gains?

In early 2013, the leadership of the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) commissioned the RAND National Defense Research Institute to undertake a collaborative, multiyear work program known as "FVAP and the Road Ahead." The project was established to assist FVAP in aligning its strategy and operations to better serve its mission and stakeholders, and to strengthen FVAP's capacity to set its own course, greet change, and communicate its role in the voting community. The RAND project team worked with FVAP to compare, reconcile, and align what was in the agency's strategy and typical of its operations and what should be, through an evidence-based approach that included logic modeling, stakeholder outreach, and a requirements assessment. This report documents the project and resulting changes within FVAP, which enabled a significant realignment of the agency's strategy and operations. The report concludes with final recommendations and guidance largely proposed to lock in and build on gains.

Key Findings

FVAP Is Making Progress

  • FVAP relies heavily on intermediaries, such as Voting Assistance Officers, to reach UOCAVA voters.
  • To play this role more effectively, FVAP needed to take several steps: (1) Create a clearer, shared understanding of its mission; (2) build trust and strengthen its relationships with its stakeholders, and (3) embrace a culture and principles of effectiveness.
  • FVAP has taken substantial steps to become one FVAP, improve its relationships with stakeholders, and embrace effectiveness. For example, FVAP reoriented its mission, reorganized its operations, and began providing more hands-on voting assistance.

Recommendations

  • Through training, especially in-person training, FVAP can engage its intermediaries more directly, get closer to UOCAVA voters, and reap other ancillary benefits.
  • To lock in and build on recent gains, FVAP will need to continue working on unifying the organization, improving its relationships with stakeholders, and embracing effectiveness.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Logic-Model Development

  • Chapter Three

    Stakeholder Outreach

  • Chapter Four

    Federal Voting Assistance Program Activities in Relation to Requirements

  • Chapter Five

    Preliminary Recommendations and Initial Guidance

  • Chapter Six

    The Federal Voting Assistance Program's Engagement with Its Operating Environment

  • Chapter Seven

    Evidence of Change

  • Chapter Eight

    Final Recommendations, Guidance, and Remarks

  • Appendix A

    Logic-Modeling Workshop and Materials

  • Appendix B

    Statutory Requirements Pertaining to the Federal Voting Assistance Program

  • Appendix C

    Survey Response Rates and Regularly Scheduled Reports to Congress

  • Appendix D

    Project-Management Tools

  • Appendix E

    Training Options and Recommendations

  • Appendix F

    Adult Learning Principles and Training Evaluation

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center and the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.