Violent Extremism in America
Interviews with Former Extremists and Their Families on Radicalization and Deradicalization
ResearchPublished Apr 1, 2021
Terrorism and ideologically inspired violence represent persistent and serious threats to U.S. national security. In this report, the authors aim to characterize why and how 32 individuals joined extremist organizations, as well as how some of them exited these groups. Semistructured interviews were conducted with former extremists and their family members, representing 32 unique stories of 24 white supremacists and eight Islamic extremists.
Terrorism and ideologically inspired violence represent persistent and serious threats to U.S. national security. The January 6, 2021, attack at the U.S. Capitol and other recent events emphasize the need for more research to inform prevention and deradicalization strategies. In this report, the authors aim to characterize why and how individuals joined extremist organizations, as well as how some of them exited these groups. Semistructured interviews were conducted with former extremists and their family members, representing 32 unique stories of 24 white supremacists and eight Islamic extremists.
Exposure to propaganda on the internet, in music, and in books and literature was present in more than two-thirds of the sample. Although formal, top-down recruitment occurred for three Islamic extremists, the majority of white supremacists actively sought out participation in extremist organizations. Among the sample, 26 had exited the organizations; of those, six were still undergoing cognitive and emotional deradicalization. Among those who exited, 22 mentioned that a person or group intervened to help them by providing diverse cultural and demographic exposures, emotional support, financial stability, or domestic stability.
Interviewees also addressed such systemic issues as unemployment and the need for more-affordable and easily accessible mental health care. These interviews led to recommendations for both research and practice that emphasize the importance of incorporating the voices of those with personal experience and knowledge of ideological extremism into future research designs and efforts to prevent radicalization and promote deradicalization.
Key Findings
Negative life events are part of, but not the sole cause of, radicalization
Abuse or trauma, difficult family situations, bullying, and other negative life events often have psychological and behavioral consequences and are sometimes implicated in radicalization pathways. However, they are never the sole or most direct cause of radicalization.
Those with mental health challenges often had difficulty accessing care
Although not every respondent spoke of mental health problems, those who did mentioned lack of treatment options that were accessible or affordable.
The enduring appeal of extremist groups seems to lie in attending to fundamental human needs
Needs for social bonds, love and acceptance, and having a life purpose go unmet for some people, leaving them prone to become involved with extremist views and groups.
Radical ideology and involvement in extremist activities have addictive properties for many
Physical violence and engaging in extremist activity online have addictive properties that appear linked to the experience of joint risk and struggle against a common enemy.
Recruitment to radical groups deliberately leverages psychological vulnerabilities
Radical groups develop ways to bolster ideological commitment through (1) restriction of access to information or circumstances that challenge ideological constructs and (2) social and cognitive strategies for reinforcing in-group bias and hatred toward people outside the group.
Extremist groups nurture a self-reinforcing social milieu
This includes shared purpose, camaraderie, friendship, and joint activities, all of which can involve both risk and emotional rewards.
Both radicalization and deradicalization are linked to "being in the right place at the right time"
An individual's experience of a dramatic, challenging life event and of highly meaningful social interactions (both negative and positive) play fundamental roles in both processes.
Heavy-handed attempts by formal institutions to deradicalize individuals often fail
Such measures taken by intelligence and law enforcement agencies are understandable because of the need to protect the public but can sometimes deepen ongoing radicalization processes and push potentially salvageable cases to more-extreme behaviors and involvement.
Stigmatization of groups seems mostly to push at-risk individuals further down the extremist path
Punitive measures, banned speech, and indignant public discourse can backfire and increase the drive for radicalization.
Media literacy, access to diverse sources of information, and positive experiences with diversity appear critical for deradicalization
In certain cases, structured and opportunistic interventions that involve exposure to people outside the group who exhibit kindness and generosity have had positive effects.
Recommendations
- Community organizations should expand opportunities for mental health care.
- Community organizations should provide opportunities for expanding diversity exposure.
- Community organizations should help at-risk parents and families to recognize and react to signs of extremist radicalization and engagement.
- Community organizations should present deradicalization messages at the right time and place.
- Community organizations should consider the trade-offs between punitive and "soft" law enforcement interventions.
- Community organizations should organize community-based educational opportunities.
- Researchers should explore the feasibility of addiction-based programs to address hate and radicalization.
- Researchers should better identify geographic and demographic hot spots for radicalization.
- Researchers should explore and develop educational and outreach efforts to help recognize and address signs of radicalization.
- Researchers should explore and design social network approaches to deradicalization.
- Researchers should continue to explore and design interventions that foster deliberate exposure to "optimal contact" with groups targeted by hatred.
- Researchers should conduct research on institutional and societal (environmental) influences of extremism.
- Researchers should design and assess programs that create safe, mentored spaces for individuals to freely express themselves and challenge one another's beliefs.
- Researchers should use both data science and ethnographic research to understand current processes of online radicalization to extreme groups.
Related Content
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 2021
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 134
- Paperback Price: $22.50
- Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-1-9774-0679-8
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1071-1
- Document Number: RR-A1071-1
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Brown, Ryan Andrew, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt, Violent Extremism in America: Interviews with Former Extremists and Their Families on Radicalization and Deradicalization, RAND Corporation, RR-A1071-1, 2021. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1071-1.html
Brown, Ryan Andrew, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt, Violent Extremism in America: Interviews with Former Extremists and Their Families on Radicalization and Deradicalization. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2021. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1071-1.html. Also available in print form.
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was supported by the National Institute of Justice and conducted by the Justice Policy Program within RAND Social and Economic Well-Being.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.