Climate hazards adversely affect the physical environment in which the U.S. Department of Defense must operate, thereby adversely affecting the performance of the joint force. Acknowledging that climate effects will likely become more severe as global temperatures rise, the authors of this report discuss findings from a study they conducted to develop links between climate and force readiness.

Climate and Readiness

Understanding Climate Vulnerability of U.S. Joint Force Readiness

Katharina Ley Best, Scott R. Stephenson, Susan A. Resetar, Paul W. Mayberry, Emmi Yonekura, Rahim Ali, Joshua Klimas, Stephanie Stewart, Jessica Arana, Inez Khan, et al.

ResearchPublished May 24, 2023

Cover: Climate and Readiness
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes Climate Hazard Pathways Appendix

Order a print copy

The physical environment in which the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) must operate is being affected by climate hazards, which adversely affect the performance of the joint force and the systems that support it. Generating, maintaining, and even increasing force readiness in light of changing climate threats is a key component of meeting high-level U.S. strategic goals, from defending the homeland to deterring aggression and strategic attacks. Acknowledging that climate effects are likely to become more severe as global temperatures rise, the authors of this report discuss the results of an initial study they conducted to develop links between climate and readiness, laying the groundwork for the eventual integration of climate risk with quantitative readiness assessment and decisionmaking to help ensure that military forces can reliably and affordably sustain needed readiness in a changing climate.

A key contribution of the study is a climate readiness framework for understanding the risk to readiness that may result from a combination of (1) exposure to climate hazards, such as drought, flooding, wildfire, and tropical storms, and (2) the underlying vulnerability of readiness inputs — i.e., people, training, equipment, and force projection — to such hazard exposure.

View the digital appendix

Key Findings

Climate and readiness are understood and studied by separate communities

  • Climate and readiness thinking operate on different timescales.
  • Many readiness-related decisions occur at the operational and tactical levels, but climate-related decisionmaking will need to occur primarily at the strategic level.
  • Near-term climate impacts may be small and locally addressed using tools currently available to operational and tactical decisionmakers; it remains possible to view climate change mainly as a "training condition" related to short-term weather events.

Climate risk is not currently integrated with readiness measurement or reporting

  • The proposed climate readiness framework can provide a useful structure for understanding readiness vulnerability to climate risk.

The climate readiness framework can provide a useful structure for understanding readiness vulnerability to climate risk

  • The framework provides a standardized means to organize ways in which climate change could affect readiness and to visualize and analyze patterns among framework elements.
  • These patterns can reveal areas of risk that may be targeted for further investigation or prioritized for adaptive action.

The full impact of climate change on readiness requires consideration of all climate hazard pathways in aggregate

  • While minor hazards in isolation may be easily overcome, a confluence of multiple pathways could quickly aggregate to mission-level impacts.
  • Many hazards could have similar impacts, leading to an aggregate effect on readiness inputs.

Information beyond hazard representation in pathways is required to understand the vulnerability of readiness to climate

  • Understanding a readiness input's vulnerability to climate change requires consideration of the input's adaptive capacity and sensitivity to a variety of hazards.

Recommendations

  • DoD should consider developing, adapting, and building upon a climate readiness framework.
  • DoD should continue to strengthen linkages between climate and readiness.
  • Readiness reporting should be structured to provide information to track climate impacts.
  • DoD should continue to identify and prioritize opportunities for implementing climate-informed decisionmaking.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
124 pages
List Price
$42.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2023
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 124
  • Paperback Price: $42.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-1-9774-1045-0
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1551-1
  • Document Number: RR-A1551-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Best, Katharina Ley, Scott R. Stephenson, Susan A. Resetar, Paul W. Mayberry, Emmi Yonekura, Rahim Ali, Joshua Klimas, Stephanie Stewart, Jessica Arana, Inez Khan, and Vanessa Wolf, Climate and Readiness: Understanding Climate Vulnerability of U.S. Joint Force Readiness, RAND Corporation, RR-A1551-1, 2023. As of October 10, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1551-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Best, Katharina Ley, Scott R. Stephenson, Susan A. Resetar, Paul W. Mayberry, Emmi Yonekura, Rahim Ali, Joshua Klimas, Stephanie Stewart, Jessica Arana, Inez Khan, and Vanessa Wolf, Climate and Readiness: Understanding Climate Vulnerability of U.S. Joint Force Readiness. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1551-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and conducted within the Personnel, Readiness, and Health Program of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.