Cover: Fundamental Capability Portfolio Management

Fundamental Capability Portfolio Management

A Study of Developing Systems with Implications for Army Research and Development Strategy

Published Feb 18, 2013

by Scott Hiromoto

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The United States Army is facing an austere budgetary environment of unknown duration. At the same time, the Army must prepare for a more diverse, burdensome and uncertain strategic environment, from conventional warfare to counter-insurgency. Anticipating these constraints, the Department of Defense (DoD) mandated the use of capability portfolio management in acquisitions, to ensure that an efficient mix of systems is being developed and fielded within strict budgetary limitations. However, broad capability portfolios contain many different fundamental capabilities, which are far from adequately studied. Further, a body of research has documented the extent and causes of cost growth, schedule delay, and cancelation in 'major weapon systems', but relatively less attention has been paid to the smaller, less expensive systems that actually make up the majority of the Army's budget. These observations motivate the performance of two 'fundamental' portfolio reviews within this dissertation that focus, respectively, on anti-improvised explosive device (anti-IED) systems and small arms, which contain a large proportion of less expensive systems. A fundamental capability portfolio review builds 'from the ground up' to assess how well the aggregations of individual developing Army systems provide for each fundamental capability. Ensuring the development of cost-effective fundamental capabilities is a prerequisite to building efficient capability portfolios.

Research conducted by

This document was submitted as a dissertation in January 2013 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Brian G. Chow (Chair), Elliot Axelband, and Fred Timson.

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.