Keeping Law Enforcement Connected

Information Technology Needs from State and Local Agencies

John Gordon IV, Brett Andrew Wallace, Daniel Tremblay, John S. Hollywood

ResearchPublished Dec 5, 2012

The National Institute of Justice strives to assist criminal justice practitioners on behalf of the Department of Justice through the scientific research, development, and evaluation of technologies and methods. Given that there are nearly 18,000 state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States, this is a challenge of great complexity, breadth, and depth. Thus, it is crucial to be aware of agencies' technology needs, as well as how they might learn about promising technologies and applications. To this end, RAND researchers conducted interviews with an extensive sample group to determine criminal justice technology priorities at the state and local levels, as well as the means by which these agencies commonly receive information on technology and the effectiveness of outreach efforts by the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center. Interview results indicated a strong across-the-board desire for knowledge management systems and low-cost, easily maintained surveillance systems, and further indicated that the Center needs to expand its outreach efforts to professional associations.

Key Takeaways

Knowledge Management and Cost Top Priorities List

  • The most-cited technology priorities were for basic information technology (IT) — knowledge management systems (notably records management systems [RMS]), basic communications infrastructure, and, to a lesser extent, camera systems.
  • There is a strong and consistent need to reduce the end-to-end lifecycle costs of these major systems.
  • There are strong and consistent needs to improve the interoperability of IT systems. Further, respondents commonly stated that NIJ should play a leading role in improving interoperability.

Technology Information Tends to Be Shared Laterally, Rather Than From a Federal Entity

  • Respondents consistently relied heavily on law enforcement associations (e.g., police chiefs' associations) to gain information on new technologies and to share information. Vendors were also reported as a significant source.
  • In contrast, few agencies reported significant awareness of the activities of the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center, whose primary mission is to assist with addressing the technology needs and challenges of state, local, tribal, and federal law enforcement outfits, as well as those of corrections and criminal justice agencies.

Recommendations

  • Priority decisions should focus on low direct cost, low lifecycle cost and interoperability.
  • The federal government should play a lead role in setting technology standards, a role that could be played by the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC).
  • NLECTC outreach must be improved. One way to go about this is to increase visibility at conferences held by professional criminal justice associations.
  • R&D investments should address three priorities: improving internal departmental knowledge management capabilities; supporting departments that share information externally; and considering how R&D investments could go toward best practices for reducing acquisition and lifecycle costs for both basic communications infrastructures and camera surveillance systems.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Gordon, John IV, Brett Andrew Wallace, Daniel Tremblay, and John S. Hollywood, Keeping Law Enforcement Connected: Information Technology Needs from State and Local Agencies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2012. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1165.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.