Individual disengagement from Al Qa'ida-influenced terrorist groups

A Rapid Evidence Assessment to inform policy and practice in preventing terrorism

by Emma Disley, Kristin Weed, Anais Reding, Lindsay Clutterbuck, Richard Warnes

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This report, prepared for the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism (OSCT) in the UK Home Office, presents the findings of a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) into individual disengagement from Al Qa'ida-influenced terrorist groups. The project was commissioned to inform policy development in relation to the 'Prevent' strand of the Government's counter-terrorism strategy. The REA sought to answer two questions: 'What are the psychological, social and physical factors associated with leaving terrorist groups?' and 'What interventions have been employed to encourage individuals to leave terrorist groups, and is there any evidence as to their effectiveness?' Because there is very little research on leaving such terrorist groups, the OSCT also commissioned a second REA of the factors involved in leaving other groups — street gangs, religious cults, right-wing extremist groups and organised crime groups — in the hope of identifying potentially transferable lessons.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Factors associated with leaving Al Qa'ida-influenced terrorist groups

  • Chapter Three

    Exploring the basis for comparison between Al Qa'ida-influenced terrorist groups and other groups

  • Chapter Four

    Factors associated with leaving street gangs, religious cults, right-wing extremist groups and organised crime groups

  • Chapter Five

    Interventions that encourage individuals to leave street gangs, religious cults, right-wing extremist groups and organised crime groups

  • Chapter Six

    Summary of lessons learned for preventing Al Qa'ida-influenced terrorism

  • Appendix A

    Rapid Evidence Assessment methodology

  • Appendix B

    Characterising the quantity and quality of evidence

  • Appendix C

    List of excluded sources

  • Appendix D

    List of sources not available

  • Appendix E

    List of de-radicalisation programmes

  • Appendix F

    List of accounts of disengagement from Qa'ida-influenced terrorism

  • Appendix G

    List of programmes to encourage exit from right-wing extremist groups

  • Appendix H

    List of programmes to encourage exit from street gangs

Research conducted by

The research described in this document was prepared for the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, UK Home Office and conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.