Courts

Report

Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making

Jury verdicts directly affect the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in the United States every year and serve a bellwether function in plea bargaining and settlement negotiations.

Jan 1, 1989
Report

Multiple damages in private antitrust suits

Stephen Salant's analysis of multiple damages for private antitrust suits ("Treble Damage Awards in Private Lawsuits for Price Fixing," Journal of Political Economy, December 1987) is generalized. The neutrality result that multiple damages do not af...

Jan 1, 1988
Report

Expanding Options for Criminal Sentencing

Describes a number of new programs that have been developed nationwide in response to crowding in prisons and jails.

Jan 1, 1987
Report

Punitive Damages: Empirical Findings

Based on cases that reached jury verdict in Cook County, Illinois, and San Francisco, California, from 1960 to 1984, this report presents analytically derived answers to questions surrounding the award of punitive damages.

Jan 1, 1987
Research Brief

Opening the Black Box of Civil Jury Behavior: A Summary of Research Results, 1987

Drawing on social and cognitive psychology and on criminal jury research, Robert MacCoun outlines approaches that can provide data essential to legislative and judicial policymakers who seek to understand how civil juries arrive at decisions.

Jan 1, 1987
Report

Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior

Advocates the use of systematic empirical research on civil jury behavior as an important tool in the policymaking process. The author discusses the methods that have been used for studying jury behavior,...

Jan 1, 1987
Report

Trends in Tort Litigation: The Story Behind the Statistics

The research suggests that discrepancies among the statistics on tort litigation can be explained by the fact that there is no longer, if there ever was, a single tort system.

Dec 31, 1986
Report

The Debate over Jury Performance: Observations From A Recent Asbestos Case

This case study describes an interview conducted with the jury that decided an asbestos products liability case in Texas in 1984.

Dec 31, 1986
Report

The Prevalence, Predictability, and Policy Implications of Recidivism

Examines the accuracy of both assumptions and the implications for policies regarding the length of sentences imposed.

Jan 1, 1986
Report

Changes in the tort system: helping inform the policy debate

This paper is extracted from the Director's Report in the Institute for Civil Justice's (ICJ) Report on the First Six Program Years, April 1980-March 1986. It reviews findings of the ICJ's research on the civil justice system regarding (1) civil jury...

Jan 1, 1986
Report

A Summary of Research Results: Trends and Patterns in Civil Jury Verdicts

This paper draws on the author's analysis of civil jury verdicts rendered between 1960 and 1979 in Cook County, Illinois, and San Francisco, California.

Jan 1, 1986
Report

Judging consent

This paper was originally presented at a symposium on consent decrees, and appeared in the University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 1987. It explores the growing interest in consent degrees, by which lawsuits are resolved with the issuance of a judgme...

Jan 1, 1986
Report

Court-Annexed Arbitration: The National Picture

Reports the findings of a national survey to determine the current status of court-annexed arbitration among state and federal trial courts, and is an update of a similar survey conducted by The Institute for Civil Justice in 1980, and published as R2732

Jan 1, 1985
Report

Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives

Represents the first systematic research on felony probationers. It is based on data on individuals convicted of selected serious felonies in Superior Court in California, who would have been likely candidates for prison.

Jan 1, 1985
Report

Summarizing RAND's Study of Adult Felony Probation

This paper is the text of a briefing presented to the U.S. Department of Justice on the results of research performed at RAND and published in RAND/R-3186-NIJ, Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives.

Jan 1, 1985
Report

Punitive Damages: Preliminary Empirical Findings

Presents preliminary information on punitive damages awarded between 1959 and 1984 by juries in Cook County, Illinois, and San Francisco County, California.

Jan 1, 1985
Report

Comparative Negligence and Jury Behavior

Examines the effect of the comparative negligence law with respect to the increase in awards to plaintiffs who take their case to trial.

Jan 1, 1985
Report

Court-annexed arbitration in the state trial court system

Research effort has been directed toward investigating the use of court-annexed arbitration in the state trial courts, and evaluating the effectiveness of this type of arbitration for managing the civil caseload and alleviating the burdens that the l...

Jan 1, 1984
Report

Reforming the civil litigation process: how court arbitration may help

This paper, originally published in the New Jersey Bell Journal, Summer 1984, describes some factors contributing to the congestion, delay, and expense that currently trouble the country's civil courts. It describes court-administered arbitration, an...

Jan 1, 1984
Report

California Enacts Prejudgment Interest: A Case Study of Legislative Action

Presents a case study of one of the most controversial actions of the 1981-1982 California legislative sessions: passage of mandatory prejudgment interest on personal injury awards (SB 203).

Jan 1, 1984

RAND Topic:
Courts

Topic Synonyms:
Bar;
Judiciary;
Tribunal

Research conducted by

Researcher Spotlight

Melissa M. Labriola

Associate Research Department Director, Economics, Sociology, and Statistics Department, Senior Behavioral/Social Scientist

Melissa Labriola is associate research department director, Economics, Sociology, and Statistics Department, and a senior behavioral scientist at the RAND Corporation. Labriola is currently leading several projects studying police and prosecutor-led diversion, including a RCT of prosecutor-led…

James M. Anderson

Director, Justice Policy Program

James Anderson is director of the Justice Policy Program and the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and a senior behavioral/social scientist at the RAND Corporation. He has been the principal investigator on a wide range of projects, ranging from policy implications of autonomous vehicle…

Explore Our People »

The RAND State Firearm Law Database

Giving Drug Policy Decisionmakers the Data They Need

Overturning Roe, a New Mental Health Hotline, Russia: RAND Weekly Recap

Civilian Casualties: Lessons from the Battle for Raqqa

RAND Remote: Informing Innovative Policy Solutions to Address L.A.'s Dual Crises

The Policy Currents Podcast

Improving Psychological Wellbeing and Work Outcomes in the UK

Managing Escalation in Crisis and War

Getting to Know Military Caregivers and Their Needs

Planning for the Rising Costs of Dementia

Courts

Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making

Multiple damages in private antitrust suits

Expanding Options for Criminal Sentencing

Punitive Damages: Empirical Findings

Opening the Black Box of Civil Jury Behavior: A Summary of Research Results, 1987

Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior

Trends in Tort Litigation: The Story Behind the Statistics

The Debate over Jury Performance: Observations From A Recent Asbestos Case

The Prevalence, Predictability, and Policy Implications of Recidivism

Changes in the tort system: helping inform the policy debate

A Summary of Research Results: Trends and Patterns in Civil Jury Verdicts

Judging consent

Court-Annexed Arbitration: The National Picture

Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives

Summarizing RAND's Study of Adult Felony Probation

Punitive Damages: Preliminary Empirical Findings

Comparative Negligence and Jury Behavior

Court-annexed arbitration in the state trial court system

Reforming the civil litigation process: how court arbitration may help

California Enacts Prejudgment Interest: A Case Study of Legislative Action

Research conducted by

Connect

Contact Us

I am interested in

Follow

Stay Informed

Resources

Site Information