<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Homeland Security Legislation</title>
     <link rel="self" href="https://www.rand.org/topics/homeland-security-legislation.xml"/>
     <updated>2017-07-11T14:40:09Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="https://www.rand.org/topics/homeland-security-legislation.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2017, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>https://www.rand.org/topics/homeland-security-legislation.html</id>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Homeland Security Issues in the 115th Congress</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/congress/alerts/2017/homeland-security-issues.html</id>
   <published>Mar 9, 2017</published>
   <updated>Mar 9, 2017</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND experts provide insight on the biggest homeland security issues facing the 115th Congress, including cybersecurity, terrorism, emergency response, DHS management issues, and border security. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/congress/alerts/2017/homeland-security-issues.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Making DHS More Efficient: Industry Recommendations to Improve Homeland Security</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Daniel M. Gerstein</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT438.html</id>
   <published>Sep 18, 2015</published>
   <updated>Sep 18, 2015</updated>
   <summary type="html">The challenges facing the Department of Homeland Security continue to evolve. Greater engagement with the private sector is essential to addressing them and executing DHS&apos;s mission.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT438.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Is Bipartisan National Security Policy Possible in Today&apos;s Political Environment?</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2015/04/21/is-bipartisan-national-security-policy-possible-todays-political-environment.html</id>
   <published>Apr 21, 2015</published>
   <updated>Apr 21, 2015</updated>
   <summary type="html">Should the United States make a nuclear deal with Iran? What threat do cyber attacks pose to our nation? Should there be intelligence reform? In this Events @ RAND podcast, Mike Rogers speaks to these and other timely national security issues.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/multimedia/audio/2015/04/21/is-bipartisan-national-security-policy-possible-todays-political-environment.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Watchdog Recommendations to Improve Homeland Security</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Daniel M. Gerstein</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT424.html</id>
   <published>Feb 26, 2015</published>
   <updated>Feb 26, 2015</updated>
   <summary type="html">The challenges facing the Department of Homeland Security are evolving and create the need for new preparedness and response capabilities. The case for change includes reform recommendations for five critical areas.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT424.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Future of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Michael Dworsky; Brian Michael Jenkins; Tom LaTourrette; Henry H. Willis</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF325.html</id>
   <published>Sep 2, 2014</published>
   <updated>Sep 2, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">Recounts the proceedings of a conference to discuss recent RAND research on issues related to the potential reauthorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, as well as the varying implications of TRIA&apos;s expiration, modification, and extension.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF325.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Review Takes Measure of Cybercrime, Medical Innovation, U.S. Security Cooperation</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/periodicals/rand-review/issues/2014/summer.html</id>
   <published>Aug 7, 2014</published>
   <updated>Aug 7, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">Stories in RAND&apos;s flagship magazine discuss the duel between cybercrime and the law, the gamble of medical innovation, and the fruits of U.S. security cooperation.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/periodicals/rand-review/issues/2014/summer.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Future of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Expiration, Reauthorization, Modification</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2014/06/11/future-terrorism-risk-insurance-act.html</id>
   <published>Jun 11, 2014</published>
   <updated>Jun 11, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">In this June 2014 Congressional Briefing, RAND experts presented findings from their recent work on the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) and discuss the different outcomes if TRIA were to be reauthorized, modified, or allowed to expire.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/multimedia/video/2014/06/11/future-terrorism-risk-insurance-act.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Future of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Expiration, Reauthorization, Modification</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/congress/activities/2014/06/11.html</id>
   <published>Jun 11, 2014</published>
   <updated>Jun 11, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">To inform the debate on whether TRIA should be reauthorized, modified, or allowed to expire, RAND experts will present the findings of their recent work on this topic and address different facets of this complex issue, including the pros and cons of proposed TRIA modifications. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/congress/activities/2014/06/11.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Allowing Terrorism Risk Insurance Act to Expire Would Negatively Impact Workers&apos; Compensation Insurance Markets</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Michael Dworsky; Lloyd Dixon</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR643.html</id>
   <published>May 7, 2014</published>
   <updated>May 7, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">Without TRIA in place, employers perceived to be at high risk for terrorism might have to obtain workers&apos; compensation coverage in markets of last resort, known as residual markets, which could charge higher premiums.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR643.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Extending Terrorism Insurance Program Could Save Federal Government Money After Future Attacks</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Tom LaTourrette; Noreen Clancy</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR611.html</id>
   <published>Apr 10, 2014</published>
   <updated>Apr 10, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act will expire at the end of this year and Congress is considering the appropriate government role in terrorism insurance markets. In a terrorist attack with losses up to $50 billion, the federal government would spend more helping to cover losses than if it had continued to support a national terrorism risk insurance program.
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR611.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Extending Terrorism Insurance Program Could Save Federal Government Money After Future Attacks</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/news/press/2014/04/10.html</id>
   <published>Apr 10, 2014</published>
   <updated>Apr 10, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act will expire soon and Congress is considering the appropriate government role in terrorism insurance markets. In a terrorist attack with losses up to $50 billion, the federal government would spend more helping to cover losses than if it had continued to support a national terrorism risk insurance program.
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/news/press/2014/04/10.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Expiration of Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Could Hurt National Security</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Henry H. Willis; Omar Al-Shahery</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR573.html</id>
   <published>Mar 6, 2014</published>
   <updated>Mar 6, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">The current terrorism risk insurance act will expire in 2014 and Congress again is considering the appropriate government role in terrorism insurance markets. If the act expires and the take-up rate for terrorism insurance falls, then the U.S. would be less resilient to future terrorist attacks.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR573.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Expiration of Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Could Hurt National Security</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/news/press/2014/03/06.html</id>
   <published>Mar 6, 2014</published>
   <updated>Mar 6, 2014</updated>
   <summary type="html">The current terrorism risk insurance act will expire in 2014 and Congress again is considering the appropriate government role in terrorism insurance markets.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/news/press/2014/03/06.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Center for Catastrophic Risk Management and Compensation</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/jie/justice-policy/centers/catastrophic-risk-management.html</id>
   <published>Jun 24, 2013</published>
   <updated>Jun 24, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">The RAND Center for Catastrophic Risk Management and Compensation (CCRMC) seeks to identify and promote laws, programs, and institutions that reduce the adverse social and economic effects of catastrophes.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/jie/justice-policy/centers/catastrophic-risk-management.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Robust Decision Making Aids Planning Under Deep Uncertainty</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Robert J. Lempert; Steven W. Popper; David Groves; Nidhi Kalra; Jordan R. Fischbach; Steven C. Bankes; Benjamin P. Bryant; Myles T. Collins; Klaus Keller; Andrew Hackbarth; Lloyd Dixon; Tom LaTourrette; Robert T. Reville; Jim W. Hall; Christophe Mijere; David J. McInerney</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9701.html</id>
   <published>Mar 5, 2013</published>
   <updated>Mar 5, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">Quantitative analysis is often indispensable to sound planning, but with deep uncertainty, predictions can lead decisionmakers astray. Robust Decision Making supports good decisions without predictions by testing plans against many futures.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9701.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Reducing the Cost and Risk of Major Acquisitions at the Department of Homeland Security</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Jeffrey A. Drezner; Andrew R. Morral</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE105.html</id>
   <published>Mar 1, 2013</published>
   <updated>Mar 1, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">Widespread cost, schedule, and performance shortfalls point to ongoing and expensive problems in the Department of Homeland Security acquisition process. Providing a common problem definition, conceptual framework, and recommendations that DHS officials can use should help improve efficiency and effectiveness.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE105.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">How Evaluation Is Accommodated in Emergency Policy Making</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Christian Van Stolk; Mihaly Fazekas</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP51789.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2013</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2013</updated>
   <summary type="html">A question this chapter posed is to what extent evaluation is accommodated in emergency legislation. The answer seems to be somewhat.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP51789.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Five Pillars of American Grand Strategy</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Paul D. Miller</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP50302.html</id>
   <published>Oct 1, 2012</published>
   <updated>Oct 1, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">For at least a century, US grand strategy has had five principle goals. It is in how they are pursued that foreign policy changes from one era to the next.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP50302.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing the Benefits of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Regulatory Actions to Reduce Terrorism Risks</title>
   <author>
   	<name>Victoria Greenfield; Henry H. Willis; Tom LaTourrette</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF301.html</id>
   <published>Apr 16, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 16, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Summarizes the proceedings of a workshop in which experts on regulatory analysis and terrorism risk examined alternative approaches for estimating the benefits of regulations designed to reduce the risks of terrorist attacks in the United States.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF301.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Book Provides Critical Review of U.S. Actions Since 9/11; Recommends Future Anti-Terror Path</title>
   <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
   	</author>  
   <id>https://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/07/26.html</id>
   <published>Jul 26, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jul 26, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">A new collection of essays by experts from the RAND Corporation examines America in the decade since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, focusing a critical eye on the nation&apos;s actions since the attacks and outlining changes in strategy needed to improve efforts against jihadist groups.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/07/26.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>
