<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>RAND Research Topic: Product Liability</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://www.rand.org/topics/product-liability.xml"/>
  <updated>2021-06-07T18:16:56Z</updated>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="https://www.rand.org/topics/product-liability.html" />
  <rights>Copyright (c) 2021, The RAND Corporation</rights>
  <author>
    <name>RAND Corporation</name>
  </author>
  <id>https://www.rand.org/topics/product-liability.html</id>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Product Liability and Moral Hazard</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Eric Helland; Alexander Tabarrok</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68378.html</id>
  <published>2020-12-11T06:15:00Z</published>
  <updated>2020-12-11T06:15:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">We estimate the impact of tort liability on a subset of consumers who have significant control over the probability of an accident: consumers of general aviation aircraft.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68378.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Unintended Consequences of Products Liability</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Eric Helland; Darius N. Lakdawalla; Anup Malani; Seth A. Seabury</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68372.html</id>
  <published>2020-12-11T05:45:00Z</published>
  <updated>2020-12-11T05:45:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">This article explains a surprising effect of tort liability in the market for prescription drugs: punitive damages shift liability from doctors to drug companies, but not when physician malpractice liability is limited.&quot;</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68372.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">When an Autonomous Vehicle Is Hacked, Who Is Liable?</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Zev Winkelman; Maya Buenaventura; James M. Anderson; Nahom M. Beyene; Pavan Katkar; Gregory Cyril Baumann</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB10063.html</id>
  <published>2019-07-12T06:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2019-07-12T06:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Hacks on autonomous vehicles could lead to deaths, property destruction, ransomware attacks, or data theft. Several scenarios illustrate the policy challenges facing the civil legal system, insurers, and others.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB10063.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Emerging Trends in Compensation for Widespread Losses</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Kathryn Kuznitsky</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF377.html</id>
  <published>2017-12-04T05:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2017-12-04T05:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">These conference proceedings explore emerging trends in compensation for widespread loss events, including regulators&apos; changing roles, the impact of liens, and claim aggregation.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF377.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Response to Inselbuch and Sackett&apos;s Critique of RAND Reports on Asbestos Trusts and Asbestos Litigation</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern; Kathryn Kuznitsky</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP66367.html</id>
  <published>2016-03-09T12:30:00Z</published>
  <updated>2016-03-09T12:30:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">RAND responds to a piece published in Mealey&apos;s Asbestos Bankruptcy Report that was critical of three RAND studies on asbestos litigation and bankruptcy trusts.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP66367.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Bankruptcy&apos;s Effect on Product Identification in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR907.html</id>
  <published>2015-05-21T09:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2015-05-21T09:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">One of the most significant developments in asbestos litigation in the past 15 years is the rising rate of bankruptcy among asbestos defendants. Bankruptcy reduces the likelihood that exposures to the firm&apos;s asbestos-containing products will be identified in interrogatories and depositions.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR907.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Bankruptcy Trusts Complicate the Outcomes of Asbestos Lawsuits</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9830.html</id>
  <published>2015-05-21T05:30:00Z</published>
  <updated>2015-05-21T05:30:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Interrogatories and depositions in a tort case against a bankrupt firm are less likely to reveal exposure to asbestos in the firm&apos;s product than if the case had occurred before the firm filed bankruptcy.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9830.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Economic Effects of Product Liability and Other Litigation Involving the Safety and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Steven Garber</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1259.html</id>
  <published>2013-02-19T08:48:00Z</published>
  <updated>2013-02-19T08:48:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Opponents of product liability claim that liability reduces product availability, increases prices, and discourages innovation. Supporters claim that liability uncovers information about drug hazards and deters socially undesirable corporate behavior.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1259.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">RAND Corporation, Risk Management Solutions Launch New Company to Develop Liability Insurance Tools</title>
  <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/03/14.html</id>
  <published>2012-03-14T07:58:00Z</published>
  <updated>2012-03-14T07:58:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">The RAND Corporation, Risk Management Solutions, Inc. (RMS) and private investors have launched a company named Praedicat, Inc., that will provide consulting services and software to the property and casualty insurance industries.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/03/14.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">RAND Institute for Civil Justice</title>
  <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/well-being/justice-policy/centers/civil-justice.html</id>
  <published>2011-10-03T18:30:00Z</published>
  <updated>2011-10-03T18:30:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">The RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ), a part of the Justice Policy program, conducts research on all aspects of civil justice, from trends in litigation and jury verdicts to punitive damages, compensation systems, and alternative dispute resolution. Directly or indirectly, civil justice issues have an impact on us all. </summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/well-being/justice-policy/centers/civil-justice.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Links Between Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts, Tort Cases Examined</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1104.html</id>
  <published>2011-08-18T06:01:00Z</published>
  <updated>2011-08-18T06:01:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Asbestos bankruptcy trusts&amp;mdash;created to compensate people injured by the mineral&amp;mdash;may be influencing tort cases. The current way that the trusts and the tort cases are linked together may result in payments that are not consistent with the basic principles of the tort liability system.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1104.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Links Between Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts, Tort Cases Examined</title>
  <author>
   	<name>RAND Corporation</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/08/18.html</id>
  <published>2011-08-18T06:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2011-08-18T06:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Asbestos bankruptcy trusts&amp;mdash;created to compensate people injured by the mineral&amp;mdash;may be influencing tort cases. The current way that the trusts and the tort cases are linked together may result in payments that are not consistent with the basic principles of the tort liability system.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/08/18.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Bankruptcy Trusts, Asbestos Compensation, and the Courts</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9603.html</id>
  <published>2011-08-18T06:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2011-08-18T06:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">People with asbestos injuries are increasingly receiving compensation from trusts set up by bankrupt asbestos defendants. This brief documents how courts handling these cases consider trust payments when determining compensation.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9603.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts: An Overview of Trust Structure and Activity with Detailed Reports on the Largest Trusts</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Lloyd Dixon; Geoffrey McGovern; Amy Coombe</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR872.html</id>
  <published>2010-07-29T21:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2010-07-29T21:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;While legislative and judicial reforms have made it increasingly difficult to obtain compensation for nonmalignant diseases in the tort system, the trust system remains a source of compensation for such injuries. This report describes the creation, organization, and operation of asbestos personal-injury trusts and compiles publicly available information on the assets, outlays, and governing boards of the 26 largest ones.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR872.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">The Effects of Product Liability Exemption in the Presence of the FDA</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Tomas Philipson; Eric Sun; Dana P. Goldman</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20091224.html</id>
  <published>2009-11-30T21:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2009-11-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">n the United States, drugs are jointly regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, which oversees premarket clinical trials designed to ensure drug safety and efficacy, and the liability system, which allows patients to sue manufacturers for unsafe drugs. In this paper, the authors examine the potential welfare effects of this dual system to ensure the safety of medical products, and conclude that product liability exemptions for FDA regulated activities could raise economic efficiency.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20091224.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Asbestos Litigation Costs, Compensation, and Alternatives</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Stephen J. Carroll; Deborah R. Hensler; Jennifer Gross; Elizabeth M. Sloss; Matthias Schonlau; Allan Abrahamse; J. Scott Ashwood</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9155.html</id>
  <published>2005-11-25T07:11:00Z</published>
  <updated>2005-11-25T07:11:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">This research brief describes work documented in Asbestos Litigation (MG-162-ICJ).</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9155.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Asbestos-Related Claims Exceed 730,000, Cost More than $70 Billion</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Stephen J. Carroll; Deborah R. Hensler; Jennifer Gross; Elizabeth M. Sloss; Matthias Schonlau; Allan Abrahamse; J. Scott Ashwood</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html</id>
  <published>2005-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2005-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Claims for asbestos injuries have risen sharply since the 1990s and total more than 730,000 through 2002.  At least 8,400 defendants have paid more than $70 billion on the litigation, 42 percent of which has gone to claimants.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Fashioning a National Resolution of Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Deborah R. Hensler</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP114.html</id>
  <published>2003-12-31T21:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2003-12-31T21:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">In this paper, reprinted from Cardozo Law Review, the author responds to Professor Brickman&apos;s analysis of the asbestos litigation problem, as well as to his proposal for a national administrative solution to the problem.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP114.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Framing the Compensation Inquiry</title>
  <author>
   	<name>Alan J. Rolfe</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP115.html</id>
  <published>2003-12-31T21:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2003-12-31T21:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">Framing the Compensation Inquiry</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP115.html" />
  </entry>
 <entry>
  <title type="html">Medical Monitoring for Pharmaceutical Injuries</title>
  <author>
   	<name>David M. Studdert; Michelle M. Mello; Troyen A. Brennan</name>
  </author>  
  <id>https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20030216.html</id>
  <published>2002-12-31T21:00:00Z</published>
  <updated>2002-12-31T21:00:00Z</updated>
  <summary type="html">The authors addressed research questions regarding the efficacy of herbal ephedra and ephedrine for weight loss and athletic performance.</summary>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20030216.html" />
  </entry>
 </feed>
