RAND Resources for Health Care Reform
Driven by concerns about the escalating cost of health care and large numbers of uninsured Americans, Congress is considering a series of sweeping changes to health care policy. These changes have the potential to transform health and health care in the United States in several ways, including expanding insurance programs to cover millions of the currently uninsured; changing how care is paid for and how costs are shared among insurers, patients, and government sources; improving quality of care through a range of methods, including measurement tools, financial incentives for providers, and information technologies; and promoting healthier lifestyle and behavioral choices.
For the past 40 years, RAND Health, one of the world's largest private health research groups, has conducted research and analysis on topics that are currently at the center of the health care reform debate. The key elements of this work are described below and include COMPARE (Comprehensive Assessment of Reform Efforts). This resource was created to help provide policymakers and interested parties with a unique way of understanding and evaluating the effects and unintended consequences of various health care reform proposals.
'COMPARE' Provides Global Positioning System for Health Care Policy
COMPARE is a first-of-its-kind online resource that provides one-stop shopping for objective analysis of health policy issues. COMPARE presents:
facts and figures about the current state of the U.S. health care system, focusing on key dimensions of system performance; a description of policy options for changing the health care system; an inventory and the status of the most prominent federal, state, and private health care reform proposals; and an interactive tool that presents the results of microsimulation analyses of the effects of different health care policy options on multiple dimensions of health system performance, including cost, coverage, and outcomes.
Visit COMPARE online
Latest News From RAND on Health Care Reform
RAND Research: Informing the Health Care Debate
Increasing Access to Health Care
Access to health care usually refers to the ease with which an individual can obtain needed medical services. In addition to policy options that would increase the availability of insurance coverage—which is linked to improved access to needed care—Congress is considering options for addressing socioeconomic and urban/rural disparities in access, including tax incentives and policy options to address primary care workforce issues. RAND research has examined factors that influence access, the effects of changes in access, and the relationship between access and health for specific populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, people with limited English proficiency, immigrants, children, and veterans.
Read More
Increasing Health Insurance Coverage
In 2007, about 45.7 million people in the U.S. were uninsured. The uninsured come from every income level, age group, employment status, gender, race, ethnicity, and region of the country. Health care coverage protects individuals against the financial risk that might result from unpredictable and expensive health care needs. Individuals who have health care coverage tend to receive more preventive care, are less likely to avoid or delay needed medical care because of cost, and may have better health outcomes than patients without coverage. Increasing the proportion of people with adequate protection from financial risk due to health care expenses is a cornerstone of many health care reform proposals. The most widely discussed options for expanding coverage to the uninsured include employer mandates, individual mandates, refundable tax credits, and expanding Medicaid/SCHIP eligibility. RAND analysts have used microsimulation modeling methods to predict the effects of specific policy scenarios on health care coverage and health spending.
Read More
Decreasing Costs and Increasing Quality
Despite investing $1.7 trillion annually in health care, the U.S. health care system is plagued with inefficiency and poor quality. The need to control costs while also increasing quality of care figures prominently in the health care reform debate. Better information systems could help, as could efforts to pay for quality and outcomes rather than for number of services delivered. RAND analysts have conducted extensive work on quality of care, estimated the costs and benefits of wide-spread adoption of health IT, assessed the effects of pay-for-performance programs, and conducted studies on public reporting of performance information and its effect on performance and patient experience.
Read More
Decreasing Health Spending
U.S. health care spending continues to rise rapidly and accounts for an increasing proportion of the gross domestic product. Trends affecting health care spending include price inflation, the number of mix of services used, increases in the population and the aging of the population; the obesity "epidemic," and new technology are significant contributors. Most health care bills are paid by "third party payers" (such as insurance companies, employers, and government programs), and so patients have little incentive to be discerning consumers who will demand high quality services at a lower cost and use less unnecessary care. Increased consumerism is also expected to encourage cost and quality competition among health care providers, resulting in lower prices for services. Drawing on publicly available data, RAND analysts have examined trends in health care spending and have also assessed how policy options such as high deductible health plans and increased cost sharing affect both costs and health outcomes.
Read More
Promoting Wellness and Prevention
There is widespread consensus that healthy lifestyle choices including diet, exercise, and preventive screenings are vital to a healthy population. While there is also agreement about the negative impact of poor lifestyle choices, and that changes in these habits—either through organized programs or the efforts of individuals—could improve health, there is no consensus about how these changes would affect health spending. Governments, employers and health insurers have considered the use of incentives in public and private health insurance programs to promote behavior change with the expectation of improving health and saving money. RAND investigators have studied the effects of obesity and disease management programs on health and health spending.
Read More
Health Care Organization and Capacity
RAND work in this area has taken a system perspective, examining how organization affects the health system's ability to provide high-quality care and use resources efficiently and effectively. RAND has conducted hundreds of analyses of how changes in health care markets, delivery systems, and financing mechanisms affect patients, providers, insurers, and medical-product manufacturers. For example, this work has extended into such areas as state health care financing initiatives for the uninsured, the impact of prescription drug benefits on health outcomes and costs, and the effect of managed care on utilization and quality of care.
RAND Research on Health Care Organization and Capacity (PDF)
Commentary: Views of RAND Experts on Health Care Reform
Innovation in Health Care Means More Than Something New — Oct. 9, 2009
If comparative effectiveness reviews lead to better decisions about how to allocate limited resources they might improve the health of the population. But the most likely outcome is that we will have more information but no system capable of using that information well, writes Elizabeth McGlynn.
Commentary
Collateral Damage in the Ruckus Over Healthcare Reform — Sep. 11, 2009
None of us can choose to live forever. But we can, usually, choose how to make the most of our remaining weeks, months, or years. Helping patients choose how to live well at the end of life lies at the heart of advance-care planning, write Steven M. Asch, Karl Lorenz, and Diane Meier.
Commentary
Finally, Presidential Support for the Individual Mandate — Sep. 9, 2009
RAND's latest analysis of options for reducing the number of uninsured shows that among all the options included in the House tri-committee bill, the Senate HELP bill, and the proposal released by Senator Max Baucus, the individual mandate would have the greatest impact, writes Elizabeth McGlynn.
Commentary
Stick to Facts to Find Health Care Change That Works — Aug. 29, 2009
The ferocity of the national debate over health care continues to build, and rhetoric has all but replaced reality. People on all sides of the issue appear to want anything but the facts, write Elizabeth McGlynn and Jeffrey Wasserman.
Commentary
Fix the Healthcare System (and Fight the Recession, Too) — Aug. 21, 2009
A little-known proposition amid the highly charged health care debate is that properly controlling health care spending could generate economic growth equal to 1 percent of gross domestic product, write Dana Goldman and Neeraj Sood.
Commentary
Co-Ops: A Very Tall Order — Aug. 19, 2009
Cooperatives are a very tall order: a new type of organization, never before tested on a large scale, meant to fix the apparently intractable problems of high and rising costs, barriers to access and poor quality care, writes Elizabeth McGlynn.
Commentary
The Public Option: Sorting Rhetoric from Reality — Jun. 24, 2008
President Obama and several Congressional leaders have recently expressed support for the idea of allowing citizens to buy into a public insurance program as part of any health reform legislation. The intensity of the ensuing debate has been fascinating given the lack of specifics that have been offered by either side, writes Elizabeth A. McGlynn.
Commentary 
Listen to the Audio
Improve Health, Not the Health Care System — Jun. 23, 2009
One reason that health reform proposals always seem to fail is that proponents promise too much. Reformers declare they will improve quality, lower costs and increase access — all at the same time. This mantra is repeated so often that the public tends to believe it is possible, when really it isn't, writes Dana P. Goldman.
Commentary
on Facebook
on Twitter
on YouTube
Top
RAND® is a registered trademark. Copyright © 1994-2009 RAND Corporation. Last Modified: November 12, 2009 