Efficacy of Frequent Monitoring with Swift, Certain, and Modest Sanctions for Violations

Insights from South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Project

Cover: Efficacy of Frequent Monitoring with Swift, Certain, and Modest Sanctions for Violations

Published in: American Journal of Public Health, v. 103, no. 1, Jan. 2013, p. e37-e43

Posted on RAND.org on December 6, 2012

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the public health impact of South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project, an innovative program requiring individuals arrested for or convicted of alcohol-involved offenses to submit to breathalyzer tests twice per day or wear a continuous alcohol monitoring bracelet. Those testing positive are subject to swift, certain, and modest sanctions. METHODS: We conducted differences-in-differences analyses comparing changes in arrests for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI), arrests for domestic violence, and traffic crashes in counties with the program to counties without the program. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, more than 17 000 residents of South Dakota—including more than 10% of men aged 18 to 40 years in some counties—had participated in the 24/7 program. At the county level, we documented a 12% reduction in repeat DUI arrests (P = .023) and a 9% reduction in domestic violence arrests (P = .035) following adoption of the program. Evidence for traffic crashes was mixed. CONCLUSIONS: In community supervision settings, frequent alcohol testing with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations can reduce problem drinking and improve public health outcomes.

Key Findings

Research Questions

  • How did 24/7 affect public health in South Dakota?

Between 2005 and 2010, more than 17,000 residents of South Dakota—including more than 10% of men aged 18 to 40 years in some counties—participated in the 24/7 program.

At the county level, researchers documented a 12% reduction in repeat DUI arrests and a 9% reduction in domestic violence arrests following adoption of the program. Evidence for traffic crashes was mixed.

Recommendations

Evaluations are needed to explore whether 24/7 can work outside South Dakota in both rural and urban areas.

It will also be useful to explore how testing programs with swift and certain sanctions can best incorporate positive incentives for compliance as well as treatment services.

Document Details

  • Copyright: American Public Health Association
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: EP-51155
  • Year: 2012
  • Series: External Publications

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.