Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback70 pages $30.00 $24.00 20% Web Discount

Based on interviews with 145 Viet Cong POWs, defectors and suspects, carried out by a Rand team of Americans and Vietnamese between July and December 1964. Whereas older interviewees went into the Viet Minh mainly for nationalist reasons, the younger generation has joined the VC for a mix of motives including protest against social injustice at the village level, lack of educational and career opportunity on the GVN side, and antipathy to being drafted by ARVN. The three-man cells into which the squads are divided are a politicized "buddy system", providing indoctrination and a continuous psychological prophylaxis against anxiety. Most interviewees believed the war would last a long time and would end not in a VC victory, but in a gradual exhaustion of the enemy. The flow of defectors could be increased by improved GVN treatment of its POWs. The VC tells its men that surrender to the GVN will bring torture or execution, and actual GVN practices all to often lend credibility to this allegation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.