Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

To advise the EC on the development of a European Cybercrime Centre, RAND Europe reviewed scholarly literature on the nature, extent, and impacts of cybercrime and collected empirical evidence on the capabilities of 15 EU member states' computer crime units in face to face visits. Findings from the literature and document review suggested a great deal of uncertainty between industry reported figures on the state of cybercrime and official recorded crimes. Nonetheless, the online criminal underground is evolving toward a service based economy. Aspects of forensic capability, investigations, intelligence sharing, training and information exchange were discussed. In addition, RAND Europe consulted Europol, Eurojust, Cepol, Interpol, and the European Network and Information Security Agency on their contribution to tackling cybercrime at the European level. A scenario based workshop was held in Brussels in November 2011 where a range of possible futures were described and considered by participants. The research team's report considers a number of options for the establishment of the ECC and evaluates their strengths and weaknesses according to a range of factors. These include its scope, activities, resources, risks, impacts and interoperability. The study considered a range of options including an ECC hosted by Europol, Eurojust, ENISA and a virtual ECC. The study considered that an ECC hosted by Europol would constitute the most appropriate way forward. The study laid out an implementation plan including expected activities for the first year of the ECC between January–December 2013.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction: policy background and objectives of this study

  • Part One

    • Chapter Two

      The understanding and measurement of cybercrime

    • Chapter Three

      The relationship between cyber(in)security and cybercrime

  • Part Two

    • Chapter Four

      Findings from the Member State interviews

    • Chapter Five

      The role of European-level stakeholders

  • Part Three

    • Chapter Six

      Developing options for a European Cybercrime Centre

    • Chapter Seven

      Analysis of the four candidate options

    • Chapter Eight

      Implementing the ECC

  • Appendix A

    Participating organisations

  • Appendix B

    Methodology

  • Appendix C

    Country reports

  • Appendix D

    Analysis of data on recorded cybercrime offences across several European countries

  • Appendix E

    Cost estimates for a European Cybercrime Centre

  • Appendix F

    Cost estimate breakdown "pathfinder phase" Jan–Dec 2013

Research conducted by

This study has been carried out for the Directorate-General Home Affairs in the European Commission and conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.