Cutting Through the "Data-Driven" Mantra

Different Conceptions of Data-Driven Decision Making

by Gina Schuyler Ikemoto, Julie A. Marsh

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Abstract

High-stakes accountability policies such as the federal No Child Left Behind legislation require districts and schools to use data to measure progress toward standards. In doing so, such policies assume that practitioners can and will use data to enhance decisionmaking and improve teaching and learning. However, educators use and make sense of data in different ways and with different rigor and frequency. Drawing on earlier RAND Corporation studies, the authors investigate the different ways in which educators understand the concept of data-driven decisionmaking (DDDM), the factors that enable or constrain DDDM, and associated implications for policy and practice. The authors conclude that if policymakers want to encourage educators to pursue DDDM — particularly its more-complex forms — they should focus policy supports on improving the availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of data; helping educators access external resources; and providing professional development options, including training. Finally, policymakers must acknowledge that the DDDM process is not straightforward.

Reprinted with permission from Evidence and Decision Making: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Volume 106, Issue 1, Chapter 5, pp. 105-131. Copyright © 2008 National Society for the Study of Education.

Research conducted by

Originally published in: Evidence and Decision Making: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Vol 106, Issue 1, Chapter 5, pp. 105-131, 2007.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. This product is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. RAND reprints present previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints have been formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy, and are compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.