Quality of Care in Episodes of Respiratory Illness Among Medicaid Patients in New Mexico

Published in: Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 92, no. 1, Jan. 1980, p. 99-106

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1980

by Kathleen N. Lohr, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.annals.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

As part of ambulatory-care review, the New Mexico Experimental Medical Care Review Organization (EMCRO) developed medical guidelines for the use of injections and informed physicians about them through written communications and personal visits. After their adoption, the EMCRO denied payment for Medicaid claims not meeting the guidelines. To study the effect of these activities, the authors compared quality of care in entire episodes of respiratory infections before and after guidelines were promulgated. Quality as judged by minimal criteria for antibiotic use improved. Percentages of episodes with appropriate therapy rose from 36% to 42% for streptococcal sore throat, from 42% to 81% for bronchitis, and from 36% to 51% for acute upper respiratory infection. Quality improved most among physicians with the poorest records initially; outliers still gave inadequate care. Assessment of episodes of care derived from claims data thus appears to be a feasible and nonintrusive mechanism for detecting deficiencies in quality and evaluating quality-assurance activities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.